Conversation

Notices

1. Ars Technica (arstechnica@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 26-Oct-2023 06:26:26 JST Ars Technica

   University of Chicago researchers seek to “poison” AI art generators with Nightshade

   Altered images could destroy AI model training efforts that scrape art without consent.

   https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/10/university-of-chicago-researchers-seek-to-poison-ai-art-generators-with-nightshade/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

   • kranq (kranq@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 26-Oct-2023 06:55:03 JST kranq

     in reply to

     @arstechnica is this the watermark / copyright ©️ benchmark the on line community needs ?

     #probably , a huge area of discussion is needed. But, YES.

     It would be great that all copyright media was by default protected from AI designed to use its content to source material.

   • Floaty Birb (floatybirb@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 26-Oct-2023 10:00:40 JST Floaty Birb

     in reply to

     @arstechnica super pleased to learn we can use science to poison our doodles so that the robots will think we drew a skyscraper when we actually drew a bagel and that will trick the robots into drawing cities filled with giant bagels.

   • Sculd🏳️‍🌈 (sculd@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 26-Oct-2023 10:03:56 JST Sculd🏳️‍🌈

     in reply to

     @arstechnica lets hope this works...

   • Pad53 News Outlet (pad53@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 27-Oct-2023 18:51:24 JST Pad53 News Outlet

     in reply to

     @arstechnica I call bullshit. If I use someone's art asa reference it falls under fair use and becomes a new work. I don't see any difference in AI doing. Tell AI to draw a tree 1,000 times and every one of them will be differen't artworks. So who got copied? Nobody, because AI does not copy and produce exact replicas.