@Zerglingman@cjd I unfortunately cannot give anyone a pass on my stance of learn English to use the Internet and computers, or else my stance falls apart.
@pwm@cjd My proposal is that we go back to charsets, reserve the first ~32 points for a standard set of control codes (which can probably just be what they are currently), except also include a "switch charset" character or so, and then everyone can do whatever the fuck they want with character length and casing and such. And in my EN charset there'll be a single "isupper" combining character instead of an entire capital set.
>A Bilingual English/Arabic based language that transpiles to Rust. thanks >Rust translated into French[10] it's the same thing? >Ћ плус плус (Serbian, "C plus plus") is a JavaScript like programming language based on Cyrillic script ????
@pwm@Zerglingman@cjd I think we might be headed for a situation though where you have learn English to use the Internet and computers, but also learn Chinese to enjoy most of the content on the internet and for computers.
@pwm@Zerglingman@cjd FWIW, localizing programming languages and their standard libraries is something people think about all the time, but there's no real incentive to push through the substantial initial effort it would take.
Naively you would think that having Java available in every language on Earth would make everyone in the world a programmer and thus create a very attractive labor market (for employers), but then understanding the original meaning of programming language keywords and easily recognizing every symbol are somewhat of an advantage, but only a small part of being able to write useful programs.
So training somebody to be a programmer is already so much of an effort that throwing out the minimum required understanding of English and latin script just isn't worth it for the people with vested interests.
Whenever someone wants to talk shit about JS, my reaction is to ask "what is the best thing about JS?" just to see if you know your stuff well enough to defend it AND attack it.
@cjd@pwm@pingviini Based on what I hear from other JS devs: recreating html features that they broke by doing things with JS. I think it's making a tri-state toggle.
@cjd@pingviini@pwm No, I'm sticking with that. I have never found anything it does worth doing, other than "things html hasn't got around to yet". I won't defend javascript, because it is shit.
@cjd@Zerglingman@pingviini@pwm the one PHP3 dev who worked on a web browser fifteen years ago decided === was a real good idea, if you want me to spell it out.