Conversation

Notices

1. Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks (washedoutgundampilot@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 02-Oct-2023 10:01:30 JST Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks

   Interesting. I get this post, but when I go digging up the original paper it seems the abstract doesn’t match. There’s always been a drive to prove there’s no difference between the genders in flight safety (a lie IME, but not just from the gender aspect) but it wouldn’t surprise me if they just lie in the abstracts

   • Christmas Coon (mebigbrain@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 02-Oct-2023 10:05:04 JST Christmas Coon

     in reply to
     @WashedOutGundamPilot >"woah women are way worse than men at this"
     >gets a phone call
     >"actually men and women are equal and women should be hired and retained more often than men"
     Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks likes this.
   • pinemarten :njp::windmill_of_friendship: 🅉 (pinemarten@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 02-Oct-2023 10:07:13 JST pinemarten :njp::windmill_of_friendship: 🅉

     in reply to

     @WashedOutGundamPilot “Adjust for variables” = “cooking the data”

     Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks likes this.
   • Ame (americanchampion@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Oct-2023 00:48:57 JST Ame

     in reply to
     @WashedOutGundamPilot Saw something similar on /pol/ a while back. Germanon was tasked with running a study to prove diverse teams did better. They did worse, of course, but he had to massage the data by making up a bunch of imaginary qualitative metrics towards that ends.
     
     Left the real data in, though, for anyone that reads it.
     Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks likes this.