Conversation

Notices

1. enzymical (e@ryona.agency)'s status on Saturday, 16-Sep-2023 15:06:31 JST enzymical
   no mint, no life :niggaheyface:
   •  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Saturday, 16-Sep-2023 15:06:30 JST 

     in reply to
     @e Sorry, I got a call. An important one I can't miss.
     † top dog :pedomustdie: likes this.
   • † top dog :pedomustdie: (dcc@annihilation.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Sep-2023 15:10:20 JST † top dog :pedomustdie:

     in reply to

     • 
     @mint @e I had to call Comcast and got that firewall bs disabled
      likes this.
   • † top dog :pedomustdie: (dcc@annihilation.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Sep-2023 15:14:42 JST † top dog :pedomustdie:

     in reply to

     • 
     • charliebrownau
     @charliebrownau @mint The worst? nah. I got :biznus: and i can talk to real people on the phone not curry munchers.
   • charliebrownau (charliebrownau@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 16-Sep-2023 15:14:43 JST charliebrownau

     in reply to

     • 
     • † top dog :pedomustdie:
     One of the worst ISPS in USA from what Ive heard
   • † top dog :pedomustdie: (dcc@annihilation.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Sep-2023 15:23:49 JST † top dog :pedomustdie:

     in reply to

     • 
     • charliebrownau
     @charliebrownau @mint Im paying for 5 static ip address
   • charliebrownau (charliebrownau@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 16-Sep-2023 15:23:50 JST charliebrownau

     in reply to

     • 
     • † top dog :pedomustdie:
     Im paying more for Superloop in Australia
     so i can talk to real White Aussies on the phone
   •  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Saturday, 16-Sep-2023 15:35:45 JST 

     in reply to

     • 
     @e I'm back but everyone has left already. Better luck next chumble session, I guess.
   • enzymical (e@ryona.agency)'s status on Saturday, 16-Sep-2023 15:40:21 JST enzymical

     in reply to

     • 
     @mint lets have an edate 1:1 on the salon :niggashy:
   •  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Saturday, 16-Sep-2023 15:40:21 JST 

     in reply to
     @e That would be too awkward.