Conversation

Notices

1. Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜ (3t@annihilation.social)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 01:54:10 JST Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜
   Interesting animation with 9/11 Twin Towers structures and why they collapsed.
   
   Still there's a red pill but not related to the buildings collapse.
   https://yewtu.be/watch?v=m7SXxVqyR7g
   • Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜ (3t@annihilation.social)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 01:54:08 JST Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜

     in reply to

     • Niclas Hedhman
     @niclas if the aluminum can has 850km/hour and it's filled with kerosene I think the perspective changes a bit. Let alone we are not talking about beer can aluminum but an alloy called duralumin and other light but super-strong composite materials and alloys used in the aeronautic industry only. Super expensive materials btw.
     
     A Boeing 757 has around 115 tons
     a Boeing 767 has 142 tons or more. Only from kinetic energy there's 1117 kw*h the energy used by ~ 11 houses needed in a whole month dissipated on a rather small cross section in a split second or less.
     
     The fire that went on after the explosion caused by the collision ignited others flammable materials from the building making it even worse for its structure. After plenty of time it burned things inside, those I beams already weakened by the impact + initial explosion, started to bend due to decreased resistance while exposed to fire.
     
     The weight of those 17 floors of Twin Tower 1 and 33 floors of TT2 could not be sustained any longer and collapsed on the unaffected lower part of the building.
     
     Exterior beams played a negative role in stopping debris being spilled and channeled instead that huge force excited by those falling 17 and 33 floors.
     
     On top of each sky scrapper there's a big sphere that weighs around 730 tons that have the role of canceling wind and eq induced swings.
     
     In 9/11 case those huge spheres acted like demolition balls wrecking thru the floors while free falling inside each of those Twin Towers.
     
     But here's your red pill. 💊
     The question is how those hijackers could do their jazz without no or little resistance from the authorities. 🤷♂️
     † top dog :pedomustdie: likes this.
   • Niclas Hedhman (niclas@angrytoday.com)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 01:54:09 JST Niclas Hedhman

     in reply to

     @3T

     You don't collapse a steel building with (effectiveley) an aluminium can.

   • Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜ (3t@annihilation.social)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 16:09:44 JST Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜

     in reply to

     • Niclas Hedhman
     @niclas yeah,already sent the money
     † top dog :pedomustdie: likes this.
   • Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜ (3t@annihilation.social)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 16:09:46 JST Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜

     in reply to

     • Niclas Hedhman
     @niclas mmm you don't get it wright in this case.
     
     In order to have less damage you need something that absorbs the blast/shock or kinetic energy and not something very sturdy.
     
     If those beams were strong enough like you said that airplane wouldn't make it inside from the first place and fell down instead like a banana peel on a car's windshield. But the blow was strong enough and on a small enough cross section to pierce your mighty facade.
     
     Things go pretty similar with a APFSDS. (kinetic armor piercing tank shell)
     Even if the piercing dart has a rather low weight, the speed (6000km/hour) and the small cross section of the impact point it's strong enough to pierce more than comfortable a tank armor.
     
     While an airplane has lower speed however it has a huge mass and pierced that building like it was made out of butter.
     
     Material, sturdy or not behave at high kinetic energy like liquids at impact.
     
     Once inside and that kerosene payload was released 100% , the building was doomed.
   • Niclas Hedhman (niclas@angrytoday.com)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 16:09:46 JST Niclas Hedhman

     in reply to

     @3T

     Do you care to buy a bridge that I have for sale? Only $2000, in downtown Geneva.

   • Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜ (3t@annihilation.social)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 16:09:48 JST Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜

     in reply to

     • Niclas Hedhman
     @niclas Windsor Tower was ~4x smaller than Twin Towers and looks pretty collapsed to me it has 12 collapsed floors. The reason it didn't completely collapse is because there were no airplanes to cut 'caverns' in it and so it didn't form that avalanche like potential where the upper part of the building can crash on the lower parts. The building was a complete loss even if only fire affected it. It had to be demolished as its structural resistance was destroyed beyond repair..
     
     The building had and exterior backbone like resistance structure which may have prevented complete collapse.
   • Niclas Hedhman (niclas@angrytoday.com)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 16:09:48 JST Niclas Hedhman

     in reply to

     @3T

     WTC had an I-beam facade, I-beams 1-1.5 meters apart. And you argue that a plane was cutting through 30-40 of them...

     Government must be proud that they got someone to believe it.

   • Niclas Hedhman (niclas@angrytoday.com)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 16:09:50 JST Niclas Hedhman

     in reply to

     @3T

     Even at those speeds, it doesn't alter the strength equations; The aluminium (millimeters thick) will disintegrate before the steel (centimeters thick), and most of the kinetic energy will be converted into deformation heat of the aircraft. Only solid steel and titanium parts have a chance to penetrate the outer steel columns.

     THAT is my 1st red pill.

     Then compare the fire at Madrid's Windsor tower in 2005, raging for something like 20 hours... That was the 2nd pill.

     Building 7; 3rd.

   • Omega Variant (omega_variant@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 16:21:49 JST Omega Variant

     in reply to

     • Niclas Hedhman
     Them buildings sure collapsed nice and neatly along with the 3rd tower which was never hit. Almost like a planned demo.
     
     But I am sure that people who testified they heard multiple explosions just before the planes hit , traces of nano-thermite on the beams, a van of mossad agents arrested in a van with traces of explosives, jews filming and celebrating the explosion and multiple cells of mossad agents being arrested and then let go without recourse is all just coincidence.
     
     Once you wrap your head around that and realize that is just the tip of the berg, heh, you realize the planes matter very little.
   • Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜ (3t@annihilation.social)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 16:21:49 JST Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜

     in reply to

     • Niclas Hedhman
     • Omega Variant
     @Omega_Variant @niclas that part go into the secret service realm and there are information and counter information..you don't wanna go into that rabbit hole...
     
     Personally I think Mossad is highly over rated. They've sent some agents that were pretty fast caught by Ro intelligence. And I don't think our intel is very top notch either. See op Black Cube.
     
     Les Semite folx aren't the puppeteers they are just strings..
     
     The brain/brains are where anyone least expects. And 'hidden' in plain sight.
     † top dog :pedomustdie: likes this.
   • Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜ (3t@annihilation.social)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 16:21:50 JST Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜

     in reply to

     • Niclas Hedhman
     @niclas 15% of an airplane is titanium and steel, there's plenty of 25-30% fiberglass which guess what is as strong as steel.
     
     What I've presented to you 1st is the kinetic energy that the plane exerted on the building but guess what there's also a reaction force that comes from the building basically pulverizing the plane in less than half a second. The reaction force must have been humongous vs the airplane kinetic energy. The reaction force more likely destroyed every possible chance of those beams having integrity and continuity very important in tall buildings. Those 56 and 100 minutes that burned were more than enough to finish the 'job'.
     
     Without those fires building would be still up but on a brink of collapse.
   • † top dog :pedomustdie: (dcc@annihilation.social)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 16:33:46 JST † top dog :pedomustdie:

     in reply to

     • Niclas Hedhman
     • Omega Variant
     @3T @Omega_Variant @niclas This guy is probably fishing
   • Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜ (3t@annihilation.social)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 16:33:47 JST Der Keymeister :chad_2: 🔐 ⬜

     in reply to

     • Niclas Hedhman
     • Omega Variant
     @Omega_Variant @niclas the overall 9/11 op was fishy