> I always err on a theory of stupidity over conspiracy.
If you've got to make a decision based on the information, sure. But it's best to keep the probable things in mind and not to dismiss things that are improbable but still possible. I think it's probable, given that the feds have an incentive and no reason not to. They shield organizations from the local cops just to make it easier to do a RICO bust: why not prop Gab up to preserve the spectre of scary right-wing boomers rising up and grilling us all? rifleboomer--commando.jpg
So the FBI spends all this time trumping up the threat of right-wing extremists, and this means their budget depends on that threat looking credible. You look at that graph, $750k, it's plausible the majority of it is fed money: if your budget is $100m or even $10m more when they bogeyman manages to scare people, then it's nothing to drop $500k on propping up one of the bogeyman's manifestations.
The best kind of opposition to have is the kind that you directly fund and monitor. :torbo: always seem to survive like a cockroach despite the fact that his platform is consistently broken and he never seems to come under lawfare rape. So weird!
If you're asking the question straight up, the posts under the Network Shatter hashtag do a good job of how Torba has made Gab seem fare more viable than it actually is.
Which would not be that big of a deal, except people invested money based on these numbers.
@DailyStormerDigest@p@11112011 He's done nothing but rip people off for years man, I saw him doing shit like that back in 2017.
Except back then he was this Trumpy alt-right shitposter wannabe. When that backfired he mutated a few more times into the weird Christian creationist whatever he is now.
The shooting wasn't his fault, he's going to be a target regardless being that his site is big enough.
@DailyStormerDigest@11112011@ins0mniak I'm paranoid that some ISP is going to use Gab as an excuse to set another bad precedent, or some group of shouty activists is going to force the ISP's hand, and that at some point, whatever bad thing has happened will affect the rest of the net.
To be fair to Torba, stuff like a shooter posting his manifesto to Gab right before doing the thing wasn't his fault.
Lying to his userbase, running bots to make his site seem more active than it is, and deliberately destroying engagement by putting in moderated Groups, that all is his fault.
@DailyStormerDigest I think it's between there and some backbone ISP; traceroute stops short from residential but I tried it from a few servers (three US, one Eastern Europe) and traceroute works fine, front page can be fetched, ping times are better than expected.
Something to do with their net. Shouldn't be a peering agreement because they're behind Cloudflare, and almost certainly not a DDoS. Maybe a Cloudflare misconfiguration on their end, maybe something going on with residential ISPs or an upstream.
(I think it's obligatory to point out that nothing of value was lost because Gab, but if something legit evil is going on with the net, that's of interest to everyone.)
Tools for port scanning to detect vulnerable servers have gotten quite good this past decade. Don't remember how it's called but there is a tool that allows you to scan one port on every single ipv4 address in the world in 15 minutes or so, provided you had the bandwidth to do it that is. It could be explained by normal ebb and flow of low level hacking tutorials.