Conversation

Notices

1. @YouthInAsia6 (dianathy@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 00:08:20 JST @YouthInAsia6

   It would have taken more than 1,100 people to overthrow America 😡

   https://www.axios.com/2023/08/09/jan-6-criminal-charges-capitol-attack-riot

   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 00:08:46 JST Machismo

     in reply to
     @Dianathy Next time, bring 100,000.
   • histoire (histoire@pleroma.skyshanty.xyz)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 00:41:38 JST histoire

     in reply to

     • Machismo
     @Zerglingman @Dianathy
     
     You could bring 1 million *unarmed* people
     
     The solution is simple and doesn't require that many
   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 00:42:33 JST Machismo

     in reply to

     • histoire
     @histoire @Dianathy But you've got to convince the glowies it's constitutional so they don't crash it.
   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 00:43:00 JST Machismo

     in reply to

     • Machismo
     • histoire
     @Dianathy @histoire (Granted you have to do that either way.)
   • histoire (histoire@pleroma.skyshanty.xyz)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 00:46:01 JST histoire

     in reply to

     • Machismo
     @Zerglingman @Dianathy
     
     >Glowies
     >Caring if it's constitutional
     
     Their entire existence goes counter to that
     
     Waste of time, just have better opsec
   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 00:46:53 JST Machismo

     in reply to

     • histoire
     @histoire @Dianathy Fair point. But how do you even do that?
     Like it seems as if several groups with a hundred-odd members have already done that, despite all the finger-pointing going around.
     But can you prove they've done it?
   • histoire (histoire@pleroma.skyshanty.xyz)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 00:52:13 JST histoire

     in reply to

     • Machismo
     @Zerglingman @Dianathy
     
     Not that I'm aware of
     
     It's one of the best reasons to use isolated cells, decentralize the work and the problem. When you centralize, you are letting them have the ability to infiltrate and actually do damage, which they are very good at.
     Machismo likes this.
   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 01:02:10 JST Machismo

     in reply to

     • histoire
     @histoire @Dianathy And then Facebook makes an instance.
     Or, worse, journos (rest in piss lmao)
     
     I agree that decentralisation is good in the sense of not letting them just tap the main nerve, but arguably even e2ee can do that much. And I for one will never argue in favour of using e2ee on a centralised service lmao, you're still using a centralised service that can just decide to ban you for encrypting your shit.
     
     And like, poast has had numerous confirmed glowies and journos. I'd give good odds there's a non-retarded one out there whose job is to blend in by joining the dunks on the stooges.
     I guess you just have to get 100 friends, go be Amish for a year, then come straight out to storm the place one day, no time for any potential glowbro in there to give warning.
   • histoire (histoire@pleroma.skyshanty.xyz)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 01:09:02 JST histoire

     in reply to

     • Machismo
     @Zerglingman @Dianathy
     
     Wait, I was talking about actual shit
     
     Everyone knows at least a few people that definitely aren't feds
     Machismo likes this.
   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Friday, 11-Aug-2023 01:10:31 JST Machismo

     in reply to

     • histoire
     @histoire @Dianathy How definitely is definitely?
     Chain of trust does sound like a great basis though.
     
     I guess I just can't fully understand because you're all from fucking Narnia or some shit, I'm never gonna meet any of you IRL. Even if fedicon happens it's gonna be like $5k for me to attend.