Conversation

Notices

1. J上校🎄🎄🇺🇦 (colonelj@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 09:06:44 JST J上校🎄🎄🇺🇦
   the trannies got our boy fightnerd :0171:
   fightnerd.png
   • mia (mia@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 09:06:40 JST mia

     in reply to

     • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
     • Maholmire
     @p @Maholmire @colonelj @maia
     
     > "Pretty funny to see libtards clown on degenerates for a change"
     
     It was at this moment, everyone realized they were speaking to a retarded nigger.
   • Maholmire (maholmire@crlf.ninja)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 09:06:41 JST Maholmire

     in reply to

     • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:
     Yeah, I'm not really down for people getting brigaded for no good reason other than being at the wrong place, at the wrong time and previous post(s) of mine would've suggested as much. Can see the 'tism emerging a smidge, but as someone who has experienced online harassment, stalking, and doxxing over the span of two years. I can understand why you might take such a hostile, hard stance against anyone remotely associating or otherwise conflating them with the rest of the degeneracy on poa.st.
     
     I was simply making a sweeping observation is all, my reply to that screenshot in particular wasn't dig at him specifically but poa.st in general as I've pointed out.
   • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 09:06:41 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:

     in reply to

     • Maholmire
     @Maholmire @colonelj @maia
     
     > I can understand why you might take such a hostile, hard stance against anyone remotely associating or otherwise conflating them with the rest of the degeneracy on poa.st.
     
     It sucks for him, I've got some sympathy, but my objection is to the tactic rather than the target. He is one example of many. How many are on the list that shouldn't be? How is it possible to have any trust or sympathy for the person that, at least in one case, was willing to make shit up to inflate the list?
     
     > wasn't dig at him specifically
     
     And I'm saying he specifically is on the list, and that it's a bad list.
   • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 09:06:42 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:

     in reply to

     • Maholmire
     @Maholmire @colonelj @maia This guy, specifically, did nothing; he's guilty of nothing but association. Anyone taking the time to comb through his posts would know this, but that doesn't appear to matter to whoever did it.
     
     I watched sunbeam.city drag my good friend through the mud: they decided that he must be some kind of fascist, because he is my friend and colleague going back maybe 15 years, because they decided that I am a fascist, because I do not ban people for their opinions. I objected in the thread, pointed out that the inquisition was stupid and that he was a committed lefty, and when the sunbeam.city fallout happened, they claimed that I'd threatened murder. I'm on the list, so I'm fair game, no one will ever try to verify it, they can lie as much as they want. If you question any of the lies, you're "literally defending a fascist"; even pointing out that I'm not a fascist is "literally defending a fascist". Fascists hate me, but it's not like that matters to these people. If there is a way to opt out of this, no one presented me with the option.
     
     So thatfightnerd is now on some list, all the evil people that they managed to dox. People looking at that list will take it as read that he's a fascist, same way they did with me, same way they did with my friend. Who's got the moral high ground? Is it just based on the choice of $ingroup/$outgroup?
     
     "Based. Where's the link to the dox list?", "there’s bound to be collateral", "I never said *everyone* from poa.st had it coming", my sincere¹ apologies if it sounds "autistic" to take this sort of thing personally. It's exploited on a regular basis to slander decent people, and for what good, precisely? Does it get the indecent people to stop? Seems to me like it's only gotten worse these past five or ten years. Seems to me like the tendency is to go after easy targets anyway. People didn't tend to get swatted ten years ago, people's employers didn't tend to get harassed ten years ago. (What else would be the point of including his LinkedIn profile?)
     
     All the participants can punch their tickets and hop on the train to hell for all I care.
     
     
     
     
     
     ¹ No.
     guilty-of-something.jpg
   • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 09:06:43 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:

     in reply to

     • Maholmire
     @Maholmire @colonelj @maia The guy involved has never caused any problems. He's nice. What are your thoughts on guilt by association?
   • Maholmire (maholmire@crlf.ninja)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 09:06:43 JST Maholmire

     in reply to

     • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:

     Pretty autistic, though there’s bound to be collateral from the dump. I never said that everyone from poa.st had it coming.

   • Maholmire (maholmire@crlf.ninja)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 09:06:44 JST Maholmire

     in reply to

     Pretty funny to see libtards clown on degenerates for a change, good job @maia. While for legal reasons I don’t condone the act of doxxing, even for those that might’ve otherwise had it coming. I can respect the hustle nonetheless.

   • pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist: (p@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 09:07:28 JST pistolero :thispersondoesnotexist:

     in reply to

     • mia
     • Maholmire
     @mia @Maholmire @colonelj @maia :terrymad2::burgerkang: