Conversation

Notices

1. kaia (kaia@brotka.st)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 18:11:48 JST kaia
   quality
   • チャノさん (japananon@mitra.anon-kenkai.com)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 18:11:47 JST チャノさん

     in reply to

     @kaia They literally crowdsourced it from Some Guy On Twitter, if I recall.

   • Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: (thatguyoverthere@shitposter.club)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 20:22:58 JST Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think:

     in reply to

     • Mico
     @mico @kaia I would imagine that has to be intentional. You probably need something unique for your one letter logo to be able to be copyright protected. I don't know but it seems if it was an error you'd have to try to make it.
   • Mico (mico@cyb3r.moe)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 20:23:01 JST Mico

     in reply to

     @kaia@brotka.st This is why X logo is worth tens of thousands of dollars, not hundred dollars :those: Good job gentlemen

   • Dentaku (Thomas Renger) (dentaku@fnordon.de)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 20:24:26 JST Dentaku (Thomas Renger)

     in reply to

     • Mirko Schenk

     @kaia @mort *Could* be done on purpose due to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poggendorff_illusion

     Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: likes this.
   • Mico (mico@cyb3r.moe)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 21:23:48 JST Mico

     in reply to

     • Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think:

     It is 100% intentional. Asymmetrical logos make us, consumers, perceive the brand as more exciting, while symmetry conveys stability and instills trust.
     
     (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0022243718820548)
     
     X logo somehow captures both.
     You just have to draw red lines to actually see it :clueless:

     Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: likes this.