Conversation

Notices

1. Moffintosh (moffintosh@berserker.town)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 20:24:47 JST Moffintosh

   in reply to

   • :nintendo_switch: Cyrus :nintendo_switch:

   @Kagekokoro @hj@shigusegubu.clu
   1) Historically they never did that
   2) Eventual legislation can always be curbed via democracy and calling your representative(s). If they go forward they can be recalled and a new representative elected

   • :nintendo_switch: Cyrus :nintendo_switch: (kagekokoro@bae.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 20:24:55 JST :nintendo_switch: Cyrus :nintendo_switch:

     in reply to

     • Proud owner of a potato sack :flag:
     @moffintosh @hj @newt@stereophonic.spaceso the lines are murky and drawn wherever the new ruling class, the Marxists, desire, then
     
     If Marxists Claim that maps are disadvantaged, what or who would stop them from abusing children? If they would be stopped at all
     
     All hypothetical questions
   • Moffintosh (moffintosh@berserker.town)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 20:24:56 JST Moffintosh

     in reply to

     • 💀💀💀 :0080: c̷̨̢̛̲̼̞̞͓̹͚̗̼͓͚͖͒̔̓̃̈̋̂́̏̆̐̐̈́̉͘͜ȑ̴̫͔͂̌̔̆̓͛͗́͐̍̃́̆ÿ̷̤̺̳̖͖͚͈́̄́͌͒͂͊͗̄̔̚p̶̢̧͇̞̯͍͇̤̖͖̙̫̪͋̏̃̃͗̎͜͝t̶͖̉̽̐̇i̴̭̜̼͖̬̽̀͆̃̓̂̚͝ͅc̸̡͙̪͎̫͚̫̘̱͚͔̫̣̣̒̃̋͜͝ 💀💀💀 :verified:
     • :nintendo_switch: Cyrus :nintendo_switch:
     • Proud owner of a potato sack :flag:

     @Kagekokoro @hj @newt

     I just asked you what the framework is, if there is no framework and no rules, everything is allowed per Definition

     The marxism framework of understamding applies to class and societal dynamics, not around fucking. What you're asking is the equivalent of asking a realist what the appropiate color is: he ain't responding because the realist theory is about geopolitics.

     Even historically, as a general line, marxists have usually been progressive, allying with disadvantaged groups and such, but even that flip-flopped: for example Romania and for a time the USSR banned abortion, Albania banned muslim names, China is racist and other less than progressive stuff. But that is because the "official" doctrine doesn't even touch the subject, so the line about what you ask ends up being what is generally the popular line

   • :nintendo_switch: Cyrus :nintendo_switch: (kagekokoro@bae.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 20:24:57 JST :nintendo_switch: Cyrus :nintendo_switch:

     in reply to

     • 💀💀💀 :0080: c̷̨̢̛̲̼̞̞͓̹͚̗̼͓͚͖͒̔̓̃̈̋̂́̏̆̐̐̈́̉͘͜ȑ̴̫͔͂̌̔̆̓͛͗́͐̍̃́̆ÿ̷̤̺̳̖͖͚͈́̄́͌͒͂͊͗̄̔̚p̶̢̧͇̞̯͍͇̤̖͖̙̫̪͋̏̃̃͗̎͜͝t̶͖̉̽̐̇i̴̭̜̼͖̬̽̀͆̃̓̂̚͝ͅc̸̡͙̪͎̫͚̫̘̱͚͔̫̣̣̒̃̋͜͝ 💀💀💀 :verified:
     • Proud owner of a potato sack :flag:
     @moffintosh @hj @newt
     Why do you assume that a lack of rules = rules
     
     I just asked you what the framework is, if there is no framework and no rules, everything is allowed per Definition
     
     I think it's quite understandable
     
     I reiterate the question, what is the framework?
     Is there an authority in communism that decides what is allowed and what is not?
   • Moffintosh (moffintosh@berserker.town)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 20:24:58 JST Moffintosh

     • 💀💀💀 :0080: c̷̨̢̛̲̼̞̞͓̹͚̗̼͓͚͖͒̔̓̃̈̋̂́̏̆̐̐̈́̉͘͜ȑ̴̫͔͂̌̔̆̓͛͗́͐̍̃́̆ÿ̷̤̺̳̖͖͚͈́̄́͌͒͂͊͗̄̔̚p̶̢̧͇̞̯͍͇̤̖͖̙̫̪͋̏̃̃͗̎͜͝t̶͖̉̽̐̇i̴̭̜̼͖̬̽̀͆̃̓̂̚͝ͅc̸̡͙̪͎̫͚̫̘̱͚͔̫̣̣̒̃̋͜͝ 💀💀💀 :verified:
     • :nintendo_switch: Cyrus :nintendo_switch:
     • Proud owner of a potato sack :flag:

     @Kagekokoro @hj @newt Why do you assume "not described" = "allowed"🤨