Conversation
Notices
-
@kho This is the least efficient design possible.
-
@mangeurdenuage @kho I'm not going to argue that point, merely pointing out that at a certain cost point it's still cheaper than trying to hire humans to do a task that can be automated
-
@mangeurdenuage @kho I don't know if that contraption can work day and night tirelessly. If they can put lights on it so it can work at night, and there are multiple machines, the harvesting system might be fast enough and profitable enough (it doesn't need a salary) for practical use.
-
@heavens_feel @kho
>(it doesn't need a salary)
:kekw: Yeah because it obviously isn't dependant on electricity and maintenance, and I'm not even speaking about the proprietary nature of such devices with contracts that these days only services thus you never own the hardware.
-
@mangeurdenuage @kho Counterpoint: it doesn't take lunch breaks or sick days and it doesn't vote.
-
@heavens_feel @kho Still, you loose 75% of harvest speed.