Could I get feedback on this #rust compiler error? Even if (or maybe particularly if!) you're not familiar with #rustlang, can you understand what's happening? Are there things you'd change of this output?
Conversation
Notices
-
Esteban K�ber :rust: (ekuber@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jan-2023 12:44:20 JST Esteban K�ber :rust: -
Esteban K�ber :rust: (ekuber@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jan-2023 12:44:18 JST Esteban K�ber :rust: I think I've gotten to the best possible output for this #rust error that I can manage today, removing as much unnecessary context and being as localized as I can. And we got a bonus structured suggestion too!
-
Esteban K�ber :rust: (ekuber@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jan-2023 12:44:19 JST Esteban K�ber :rust: Thank you everyone for your feedback. I've now filled two PRs. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106400 for the change in the screenshot, and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106399 to address the apparently very common issue of the primary label being misleading.
Adrian Cochrane repeated this.
-