Conversation
Notices
-
mkultra (mkultra@wolfgirl.bar)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 08:24:45 JST mkultra I'm going to keep hammering my point on keeping around deranged weirdos until everyone either gets it or permalogs. - Machismo repeated this.
-
Turd Flinging Monkey (tfmonkey@merovingian.club)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 08:24:42 JST Turd Flinging Monkey @mkultra 1. you would be right if women were never given rights, especially voting rights. This made them political actors. This is solvable however.
2. The incel problem can be solved in the same way removing women as political actors can be solved. The problems are one and the same.
3. God gave men a biological and emotional need for love and sex, and Feminism ruined everything, forcing men to seek alternatives.
All of these are the same problem with the same solution.
Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks likes this.Machismo repeated this. -
mkultra (mkultra@wolfgirl.bar)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 08:24:43 JST mkultra @Tfmonkey
The point doesn't nbeed to be belabored, its self evident to anyone with a functioning brain. The actual issue here isn't the substance of what she's saying, its that RW circles give her engagement, even in the outrage mode.
I am a right winger, and my concern online is 1 part entertaining and 1 part political. Women are categorically not political actors and therefore have no real bearing in a political space, their inclusion is to the detriment of said space as such. Women have a lot of value, just not in spaces that teleologically boil down to violence.
I should also attack "incel" discourse as it detaches what is essentially a sociological issue with the phenomenon of liberalism from the systemic critique of liberalism as such and is reframed by a PUA re-appropriation of issues in terms of merely having sex. Access to sex isn't an issue, the real issue is that liberalism has successfully destroyed familial social technology to such an extent that "incel" as a category can be parsed. Properly understood all forms of liberalism must be combated as system and as concept for any resolution to the individual issues discussed to take place. This is the obvious conclusion prevented from taking hold in discourse precisely because of liberalism itself, but this critique isn't really suited to this reply.
Throw out your sex toy and turn to God.Weaf :jv::nv: likes this.Machismo repeated this. -
Turd Flinging Monkey (tfmonkey@merovingian.club)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 08:24:44 JST Turd Flinging Monkey @mkultra She's comparing men who masturbate to sluts who take a mile of dick and have had a dozen abortions.
It's like a drug addicted prostitute with AIDS saying that she shouldn't be judged because people take over-the-counter cold medicine.
Weaf :jv::nv: repeated this. -
skoomer🍟 (deesenaughts@bae.st)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 08:25:50 JST skoomer🍟 @mkultra You can stop being a loser coomer. You can't stop being a used up roastie skank. -
mkultra (mkultra@wolfgirl.bar)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 08:27:46 JST mkultra @Tfmonkey
The formalism of a thing is not its reality. Women can play at being political actors but they are not in essence and they will eagerly tell you this as soon as the subject of the draft comes up. I do not engage in fantastical theorizing about what I am told by formalisms, this is against the Bible and the wisdom of Plato. -
Hoss Delgado (hoss@shitpost.cloud)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 08:27:55 JST Hoss Delgado >being born female means being born unredeemable -
mkultra (mkultra@wolfgirl.bar)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 09:11:06 JST mkultra My favorite part of this particular niche of "discourse" is people resorting to self reported studies for info. Weaf :jv::nv: repeated this. -
mkultra (mkultra@wolfgirl.bar)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 09:11:07 JST mkultra If you kept your circles limited to deranged weirdos, spergs, and others, discourse would be productive.
Fedi is worse off for letting mainstream e-rw/dissident gender discourse in.
I'm guilty of this, but we've got the solution well and sorted, issues fit together, nothing is truly individual, and you can't individually effect politics.Weaf :jv::nv: likes this. -
LodedDiaper (lodeddiaper@marsey.moe)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 21:09:29 JST LodedDiaper Responsibility before rights, basically. -
mkultra (mkultra@wolfgirl.bar)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 21:09:30 JST mkultra @LodedDiaper @LukeAlmighty
Women are the subjects of politics, IE they are part of the polity and effected by it, but ultimately irrelevant to it in its essence. The essential nature of politics is violence and women are incapable of political violence biologically. Thusly women ought to have no say in the sphere, they cannot truly affect it.
To put it another way, if a man orders men to kill other men, or votes for it, he does so as a man, capable of doing what they do, in principle. A woman cannot do this, and it is thusly morally wrong to expect or place her in a position to send men to death. -
LodedDiaper (lodeddiaper@marsey.moe)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 21:09:31 JST LodedDiaper Elaborate -
LodedDiaper (lodeddiaper@marsey.moe)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 21:09:32 JST LodedDiaper Incel discourse or Bible Larpers? -
mkultra (mkultra@wolfgirl.bar)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 21:09:32 JST mkultra @LodedDiaper @LukeAlmighty
neither, right wing woman "discourse" -
mkultra (mkultra@wolfgirl.bar)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 21:09:33 JST mkultra @LukeAlmighty
If you don't get it, you are a very fortunate soul spared much "discourse" -
LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 (lukealmighty@gameliberty.club)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 21:09:34 JST LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @mkultra
I don't get it. -
mkultra (mkultra@wolfgirl.bar)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Jun-2023 21:10:04 JST mkultra @LodedDiaper @LukeAlmighty
Rights are a formalism around responsibility, not a priveledge. Property rights entail responsibility for property, gun rights entail responsibility for firearms, speech rights entail a certain degree of responsibility for speech, and so on.
But I'm not talking about rights here, I'm talking about realities. Politics is organized violence, and thusly people who cannot enact violence are definitionally a-political. Consider children for example.