Conversation

Notices

1.  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Friday, 16-Jun-2023 01:29:08 JST 
   @AyyLMAO >Have you heard about the ActivityPub protocol
   What do you think half of the thread is discussing? My point was, different AP implementations with different purposes (in this case, Pleroma/Misskey/Mastodon/whatnot on one side, Lemmy on other) define their behavior independently. Hence the inherited mentions here and lack of them on Lemmy's side. I don't even mind it that much, it makes the network more fun.
   >You know what, just forget about it. Let's not interact again.
   Oh well.
   • kroner :blobcatsanta: (kroner@seal.cafe)'s status on Friday, 16-Jun-2023 01:46:28 JST kroner :blobcatsanta:

     in reply to
     I'm sort of stealing/adapting Lemmy's apub implementation for my own project and I know one of the main features of apub is to have multiple types of software being able to interact with each other and stuff, but would it be possible to just federate with instances of my own project? I don't really want to shit up pleroma/mastodon with posts from my project
      likes this.
   •  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Friday, 16-Jun-2023 01:46:59 JST 

     in reply to

     • kroner :blobcatsanta:
     @kroner @AyyLMAO It should be. Fchan posts never federated to Pleroma, for example.
   • kroner :blobcatsanta: (kroner@seal.cafe)'s status on Friday, 16-Jun-2023 01:58:52 JST kroner :blobcatsanta:

     in reply to

     • Ademan
     Lemmy sort of does this with federation allow list and deny list (basically primitive MRF), but I'd rather just have federation on by default and not have posts/comments federate out to pleroma/mastodon as the threads could look weird and broken here.
     
     I mean maybe I could integrate somehow with other projects like friendica, pixelfed, peertube, etc but idk
      likes this.
   • Ademan (ademan@thebag.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Jun-2023 01:58:53 JST Ademan

     in reply to

     • kroner :blobcatsanta:

     Just do whitelist-only federation?