Conversation

Notices

1. :archlinux: :nyarch: :verified: (lewdthewides@hidamari.apartments)'s status on Friday, 16-Jun-2023 00:40:57 JST :archlinux: :nyarch: :verified:
   @AyyLMAO your replies are stripping out everyone else from getting notifications
   • Machismo repeated this.
   •  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Friday, 16-Jun-2023 00:40:57 JST 

     in reply to
     @lewdthewides @AyyLMAO Just a consequence of trying to make physically incompatible discussion platforms (Reddit-lite and Twitter-lite) speak the same protocol.
   • Token (coin@asimon.org)'s status on Friday, 16-Jun-2023 00:42:24 JST Token

     in reply to
     @lewdthewides @AyyLMAO Maybe it's because the nature of the Reddit-style reply, he only mentions the one above. To tag the rest he needs to do it manually.
   • pomstan (pomstan@xn--p1abe3d.xn--80asehdb)'s status on Friday, 16-Jun-2023 01:15:17 JST pomstan

     in reply to

     • 

     @mint @AyyLMAO @lewdthewides can’t you create per-thread inbox/outbox/whatever purely in terms of AP so that it would be truly instance-agnostic?

      likes this.
   •  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Friday, 16-Jun-2023 01:21:18 JST 

     in reply to

     • pomstan
     @pomstan @AyyLMAO @lewdthewides In all AP impelmentations I've seen inboxes/outboxes are actor-bound if an instance-wide inbox isn't being used. There are no separate fields for inboxes in objects, so making a thread-wide inbox would require making that thread an AP actor.