Conversation

Notices

1. of nothing (apropos@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Saturday, 10-Jun-2023 04:46:12 JST of nothing
   Q: what do I think about the latest lawfare about Trump?
   A: There should *at least* be 100 counts in the indictment. A 37-count is fucking lazy. What, did they tell ChatGPT to give them a prime number of indictments? Here are the prime numbers from 100-200: 101 103 107 109 113 127 131 137 139 149 151 157 163 167 173 179 181 191 193 197 199. Pick one of those. It's not any harder to make up two fake charges after you've made up one.
   • Ardainian Hebrew Israelite (ardainianright@detroitriotcity.com)'s status on Saturday, 10-Jun-2023 04:46:11 JST Ardainian Hebrew Israelite

     in reply to
     @apropos 6 gorillion indictments would be too on the nose.
   • Ardainian Hebrew Israelite (ardainianright@detroitriotcity.com)'s status on Saturday, 10-Jun-2023 04:56:26 JST Ardainian Hebrew Israelite

     in reply to
     @apropos I mean that's an awful lot of crimes to commit in just 4 years...
   • of nothing (apropos@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Saturday, 10-Jun-2023 04:56:27 JST of nothing

     in reply to

     • Ardainian Hebrew Israelite
     @ArdainianRight would it? Would it really? I don't see how literally millions of counts would change anything about how on the nose they are
     
     But practically speaking, it'd just piss off the court.