@ArdainianRight @Suiseiseki Kinsella honestly managed to convince me that in extremely limited scenarios - basically only trademarks - "IP" can actually be okay. I love his stance that even in those few scenarios, it's ultimately a consumer-vs-trademark-abuser dispute which the trademark holder has effectively no stake in, since the only person actually being harmed is the consumer who accidentally paid for a mislabeled product, not the trademark holder who allegedly "lost" a sale they likely wouldn't have gotten to begin with.