@ignaloidas @Moon I find it remarkable, that a vast majority holds the conviction that pornographic matetial is harmful to an underaged, meanwhile it is hard to find any data suggesting that. Sure, one could argue that there exist no studies on the topic, because any experiment would be unethical under the assumption that is harmful to underaged. The best argument i've heard so far is that in pornography women are objectified and that children are more likely to be influenced by that than adults. That makes me wonder why all these Andrew Tate videos are still on youtube, and nobody is complaining about that. I suspect there is something ideological going on here. If i had to guess, i'd say that children are seen as pure creatures, sexuality is seen as something dirty and that the idea that child/underaged could want to watch pornography stains their purity. It's a bit like the glorification of female virginity that you can find in some religions.