@jeffcliff Idk. I think a sign like that could work. Most people *really want* their food to be clean. I don't think that policy would result in a race to the bottom where the companies that cut costs by doing that are rewarded and those that don't go out of business. What do you think? @novid@anti_disease@lnxw37b2
@Hyolobrika@jeffcliff@novid@anti_disease@lnxw37b2 I can't even believe it needs to be legislated that people touching food have to wash their hands. I think those signs that tell employees to wash their hands probably are not the thing that makes a person remember. I don't know how many people have a witness when they go to the bathroom today to verify they've correctly followed protocol. We kind of put a bit of faith in people when we let them touch our food regardless of what laws might exist, and I can't imagine a scenario where you get sick and manage to prove that employee x didn't wash their hands.
@Hyolobrika@jeffcliff@novid@anti_disease@lnxw37b2 couldn't you just say there needs to be a sanitation policy and it needs to be available upon request or displayed for all patrons to see? It seems so obvious that you need to wash your hands when dealing with food I just don't see any reason to have such silly laws that then need to be enforced, technically up to the point of using deadly force. It might not even require mandating that your sanitation policy be public as long as the public knows anyone not willing to share their policy is probably doing gross shit to your food.
@jeffcliff I showed this to someone and he pointed out that there would still need to be a law making sure they say that, which is pointless when you can just mandate handwashing directly. @novid@anti_disease@lnxw37b2
@Hyolobrika@novid@jeffcliff@lnxw37b2@anti_disease sure. I mean how do you know they are being honest now? The sign doesn't really mean all that much other than to check a box and satisfy the legal requirements and probably offer some protection for the business owner from liability. Sure rat poop inspectors take a look around from time to time, but no one stands over employees making sure they comply with the wash your hands rule. I would imagine most people [who are washing their hands now] would wash their hands without a sign. I also suspect there could be plenty of employees handling food who don't wash up (or at least don't do it properly) with it already being a legal requirement.
@Hyolobrika@novid@jeffcliff@lnxw37b2@anti_disease Yeah it would be a cultural shift. I guess I'm just not convinced that the signs we have today do anything. I've been to restaurants where the signage is damaged or missing and my first thought wasn't "Oh no how will the employees remember to wash their hands". When you dine out or let people touch your food (especially if you can't watch their every move) you are putting some faith in the hope that they won't poison you [with or without laws]. I honestly think that if a restaurant had a tendency to make people sick they wouldn't be around very long. Hell I imagine one food poisoning is all it really takes to ruin a small business. Somehow dole and all the big food distributors manage to do it with a bit of regularity and I don't think they get into much if any trouble.
@thatguyoverthere Interesting. But the thing is with that: businesses aren't going to voluntarily put up a sign saying that they are shit. So customers are going to have to look out for the absence of a sign rather than the presence of a sign. And that's not something people are used to doing. And it's easy to miss it if you're in a rush. If the ancap model is used for other things, the number of signs you have to look out for stacks up. @novid@jeffcliff@lnxw37b2@anti_disease