Given the unrealistic nature of his attributed accomplishments, it's more likely that the supposed "Adolf Hitler" is a composite figure based on the numerous 20th Century dictators and a reworking of the Napoleon myth, which was itself a 19th Century Apollo myth. In fact when we analyze the name we find "noble wolf, underground river." This is obviously a nod to the koryos, that sacred Aryan warrior institution, and to the belief of a buried, but still powerful current of strength in the German people. His supposed enemies were named "Steel", and "Church-hill", the legendary character of his life is obvious to all but the most ridiculous of reactionary antiquarians. Archaeologists haven't been able to find any evidence for this "Second World War" conflict. The twentieth century was one of continually increasing prosperity, hardly what we'd expect if there was a huge and devastating war. It was most likely a minor border war between France and Germany, which then expanded in subsequent retellings throughout the ages. Even the fall of the Japanese Empire is attributed to the Hitler myth, it was obviously an unrelated event that was later absorbed into the greater "World War" myth cycle.