If you’re against trans rights, you’re against human rights. Because trans rights are human rights. You don’t get to pick and choose who qualifies as human.
@aral Why the effort is made to dehumanize, starting with classification of more and less based on whatever real or ascribed traits. Or rather, the more is never described, just implied by what is exhaustively made less.
@aral Sorry, I was not writing as clearly as the thought presented itself to me. Too early for me too ;-) I was commenting on how denying people (human) rights, starts/goes with dehumanizing them. Traits are picked for which you are deemed less than others, for which you are less human. And the discourse's default 'full humanness' (like color, sexuality, gender, etc.) is not defined directly, but only implicitly by defining what deviates or detracts from your humanness. Insidious.
@smokku As long as there are those who will deny people their rights if you use one of those terms, then yes, we do. So do we need the term trans rights? Yes, as long as people deny trans people their human rights. Dropping the terms – not speaking of them – plays straight into the hands of those who would have them forgotten as a prelude to erasing them from existence altogether.
@smokku I do see your point and it is a valid concern. However, I feel we can do more good in explicitly stressing their equivalence in a climate where stating “Black Rights Matter” is met by some with “All Rights Matter” (ironically and yet also predictably enough, by those who don‘t feel that Black rights do matter).