Conversation
Notices
-
@Shadowman311 @5th_level_druid @AdHocToth @Boomerman @Godcast I'm sure we would've continued to exist, but suppressing revolts would've involved saturation bombing and probably nukes. I'd rather be the victor in an unjust war than the loser in a just one.
-
@GamerHitler @5th_level_druid @AdHocToth @Boomerman @Godcast In WW2 the 2 choices were as follows;
An Allied Victory: Where jews took complete control over the US and the west and then drove it into the ground in hopes of exterminating all Whites on earth (you are here)
An Axis Victory: Where Hitler ruled over the west and established NS satellite states in the non-German western powers where Whites could live in comfort, provided they bent the knee to the tenants of National Socialism
There was no choice that allowed for self determination, the choice was one hostile foreign power that wants my entire race dead, and another hostile foreign power that wants my race to live but by their rules, of course I would pick the latter in a heartbeat. And the only reason you would refuse to is because you probably aren't in any of the groups that Hitler wanted to protect.
-
@GamerHitler @5th_level_druid @AdHocToth @Boomerman @Godcast Why would Whites in the 1940s US launch a revolt against national socialism? A plurality if not a majority of them sympathized with its ideals, its why the Holocaust had to be elevated to prominence in the 50s and 60s. And don't pull the whole "French Resistance" bs on me, without OSS and MI6 involvement that would have never existed, Whites under Hitler would have been nothing but comfortable and would have had no reason to revolt, especially if he promised to keep blacks away from their children and communities.
-
@Shadowman311 @5th_level_druid @AdHocToth @Boomerman @Godcast So you prefer comfort and ease of a gentle occupier over self-determination?
Besides that, you're assuming that the occupiers would continue to be well-behaved forever. This is not what occurs once those occupiers no longer fear a multi-front war, and you are totally at their mercy.
-
@Shadowman311 @GamerHitler @5th_level_druid @AdHocToth @Boomerman @Godcast well the 2nd option wouldn't have happened because Germany wouldn't have the will or ability to invade the US or occupy the USSR. Germany probably would have just controlled Europe up to Ukraine while the rest of the world is free to do what they want
-
@Groomschild @5th_level_druid @AdHocToth @Boomerman @GamerHitler @Godcast A loss in WW2 would have crippled the US and would have blown fundamental holes in the ruling ideology of liberalism, even if the Germans didn't occupy them physically, ideologically NS would have risen to prominence within the country itself (in part due to German espionage). Liberalism relies on always being the biggest man in the room, take that away and it folds like paper in a hurricane.
-
@GamerHitler @Shadowman311 @5th_level_druid @AdHocToth @Boomerman @Godcast I would prefer to be ruled by a foreign king of the same race as myself who respects the natural law than being ruled by a faceless parasitic elite who think they are above God.
-
@GamerHitler @Shadowman311 @5th_level_druid @Boomerman @Godcast >3rd option: states' rights and constitutional amendments borther. Vote harder goy. All you have to do is break the law
Keep poking with that stick glow nigger. Your faggoty limp wrists are going to give out sooner or later
-
@Shadowman311 @5th_level_druid @AdHocToth @Boomerman @Godcast 3rd option: states refuse to send men to be enlisted, and FDR flails around like a crippled retard while nothing happens. Unfortunately (and read Ron Unz's American Pravda series on the era) the America First movement of that era was destroyed by the FBI.
Oddly familiar, no?
GamerHitler
Shadowman311
Groomschild
Cool
AdHocToth
All ０７６萌ＳＮＳ content and data are available under the