Conversation
Notices
-
well. it has quite a few issues with neutrality, for example in one place you describe footage as 'atrocity propaganda' when it could have adequately been described by a word that is equally accurate but not as emotionally loaded. when people do that, i am distrustful because it indicates they are trying to convince me of some topic. i would prefer that they instead try to present facts to me, at which point i will come to my own conclusions. the former sort of behavior is endemic in journalism, and one of the major causes of distrust. i urge you not to behave like a journalist.
that aside, for my preferences, it has too many pictures compared to written content. and with how short it is, i think it is quite far from scholarly.
still, i think that someone like me is not really your target audience
- Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks likes this.
-
@fluffy @Wyatt You might like my article about the human skin lampshades, tattooed skin and shrunken heads. The claim about the lampshade was peacefully sunsetted by the Holocaust officials but they still maintain the narrative about the other two things.
holocaust.claims/buchenwald/shrunken-heads-and-tattooed-human-skin-part-one/
-
>define inconsistent
>3 min vs 5 min
i mean about those who say there were lanterns made of human skin or forced incest or cock fight type arenas. is the gas chamber eye witness testimony any less credible if other eye witnesses give false testimony, or testimony inconsistent with a gas chamber?
touch fluffy tail
Holocaust.claims :njp:
All ０７６萌ＳＮＳ content and data are available under the