Conversation
Notices
-
@GamerHitler @Shadowman311 @Godcast Youre not making an argument dumbass youre calling people dumb for not playing around with your fedposting. Its fucking obvious you want some to agree with you that "getting spies" on the inside of the military is a good idea. Its not youre a retard fuck off
-
@Boomerman @Shadowman311 @Godcast Again, you're responding to an argument that I did not make, but instead an argument in your own head. Reread my posts and try again.
-
@GamerHitler @Shadowman311 @Godcast Im sorry youre an incoherent retard so lets try this again. Whats your argument if ive misinterpreted it?
-
@Boomerman @Shadowman311 @Godcast My argument is essentially that you're not obligated to follow any rules against your enemies that they can't make you follow, and that you avoid being forced to follow rules your enemy makes by deceiving them.
Deception is a force multiplier.
Furthermore you can and should use your enemy's rules against them whenever possible, as they can't fight back against that without dismantling those rules, attacking their people, or showing that the rules are one-sided and therefore illegitimate.
"Don't follow the rules," can be as simple as seducing a libtard's wife, having her divorce-rape his wallet, then dumping her. That is not even remotely illegal except maybe in Texas or if (definitely) you're in the military (and you shouldn't try it if you're in the military), but it's a good example. The lack of illegality makes it great because there's no legal consequences for you if you do it.
You can't be immoral to people who don't have morals.
Study how the system works and turn it against your enemies.