Conversation

Notices

1. Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: (thatguyoverthere@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Apr-2023 18:59:22 JST Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think:
   Can a person actually be convicted of concealing a crime without being convicted of the crime they concealed?
   • Jester Sk00n of Pooland (pawelk@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 06-Apr-2023 00:59:22 JST Jester Sk00n of Pooland

     in reply to

     @thatguyoverthere

     That sounds like a conspiracy to me.

   • Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: (thatguyoverthere@shitposter.club)'s status on Thursday, 06-Apr-2023 00:59:22 JST Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think:

     in reply to

     • Jester Sk00n of Pooland
     @PawelK apparently Trump was arraigned on 34 attempts to conceal a more serious crime (when you read the indictment it seems like there are 2 or 3 charges per book entry). You can't see any detail about the entries in his financial records in the indictment, but you have one charge for his books and another for Cohen's over and over. The claim is these are fraudulent in an attempt to conceal criminal activity. I'm not a lawyer or familiar with laws I haven't directly interacted with myself, but it would seem that in order to be charged with concealing a crime you should need to be convicted of the alleged crime first. No idea. Are the book entries illegal either way? If so, why bother pointing out the concealment portion at all in the indictment to begin with, especially if the other crime hasn't been tried (or even charged afaik)?
     
     I don't keep up with this stuff anymore so just kind of playing catch up.
   • Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: (thatguyoverthere@shitposter.club)'s status on Thursday, 06-Apr-2023 01:09:35 JST Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think:

     in reply to

     • dew_the_dew :verified:
     • Jester Sk00n of Pooland
     @dew_the_dew @PawelK yeah definitely might be. Washington are busy busy bees always scheming. (perhaps locusts is a better analogy).
     
     I'm just wondering if whether it even makes sense. Maybe there are more serious indictments lined up which this relates to or something, but the order seems fucked up. Maybe it doesn't matter. Maybe it's all just political theater and you're not supposed to ask the magician how his tricks are performed.
   • dew_the_dew :verified: (dew_the_dew@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Thursday, 06-Apr-2023 01:09:36 JST dew_the_dew :verified:

     in reply to

     • Jester Sk00n of Pooland
     i'm starting to think this is a distraction for something else
     
     the libs are jubilant and actually following it
     Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: likes this.
   • Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: (thatguyoverthere@shitposter.club)'s status on Thursday, 06-Apr-2023 01:26:15 JST Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think:

     in reply to

     • dew_the_dew :verified:
     • Jester Sk00n of Pooland
     @PawelK @dew_the_dew > I'm sure it's all above board
     
     /s
   • Jester Sk00n of Pooland (pawelk@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 06-Apr-2023 01:26:16 JST Jester Sk00n of Pooland

     in reply to

     • dew_the_dew :verified:

     @thatguyoverthere @dew_the_dew
     Check up with case of DiCaprio funding Obama's campaign and likely as well the following presidential one by democrats, funded with dirty money (billions) stolen from Malaysian state by now fugitive one staying under CCP control.

     At least $30M was shifted from alleged CCP through mentioned crimi and later DiCaprio to Obama's campaign.

     One of damage control means is the movie about some pipeline by Hollywood, advertisef recently.

     Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: likes this.