@eff that's the point? it wasn't as if people went to rednote to get more security or to have more freedom of expression, it was a middle finger as in "oh, you don't want the Chinese to have my data?" the fact that people don't get that baffles me
@eff@cooperq@verge I doubt that the people going to Redbook are concerned about the "public scrutiny" of the app. I suspect they only want their bread and circus.
Rednote shares data with Facebook and Google ad networks, so using it doesn’t protect your data from US-based companies. It also has more pervasive censorship than similar apps. What we really need isn’t a new app—it’s a federal privacy law. https://www.eff.org/wp/privacy-first-better-way-address-online-harms#Legislation
Some states have passed strong privacy laws, but so far, we do not have a federal law. In our view, the discussion of how banning TikTok fails to protect privacy has made it more likely that we can reach a privacy law, because legislators are waking up to the reality of the surveillance ecosystem. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/12/eff-statement-us-supreme-courts-decision-consider-tiktok-ban
Individuals must tell their legislators to pass a comprehensive privacy law. But there are also actions YOU can take right now to protect yourself from data surveillance by U.S. and foreign companies and governments. Visit our Surveillance Self-Defense Guide to learn more. ssd.eff.org
Lastly, it can be easy to assume that there is no way to protect privacy, and that surveillance gets worse every year. Don’t give up hope — there are many reasons to be optimistic. Here are just a few: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/02/privacy-isnt-dead-far-it