remember that pushing for stronger copyright protections re: "AI" only works if you push for it to apply retroactively, otherwise OpenAI just trained their models on all of this and all of their competitors can't.
shit sucks.
remember that pushing for stronger copyright protections re: "AI" only works if you push for it to apply retroactively, otherwise OpenAI just trained their models on all of this and all of their competitors can't.
shit sucks.
what is it, $250,000 per infringement that they hit filesharers with? I figure it's gotta be at least 100k people they've violated the copyright of, minimum, right?
25 billion seems like reasonable damages, but I'm sure they'd find a way to push it higher by lying to the judge
this won't happen though because they aren't the 'small guys' so be careful pushing copyright strengthening without any sort of punishment. I've heard rumors openAI is lobbying for it, for exactly these reasons, and I'm willing to tentatively believe that at this point with how it's suddenly hit the broader media.
@jos @NireBryce Baldur Bjarnason suggests that regulation:
1. Clarifies that those running the service are responsible as a publisher for the text their AIs spit out. To the same degree as they are for employees.
2. Requires disclosure of the use of LLM technologies.
3. Training sets should be opt-in & (I think more importantly) public.
@NireBryce Maybe going in the opposite direction could help: abolish copyright entirely or decrease restrictions, and require OpenAI to release all the code and data for their models.
076萌SNS is a social network, courtesy of 076. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-beta0, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All 076萌SNS content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.