Conversation

Notices

1. LS (lain@lain.com)'s status on Friday, 20-Dec-2024 18:35:27 JST LS
   > "Let’s be honest: that last sentence was far too generous. Many of us engaged in practices that, in hindsight, were borderline dishonest. We abused experimenter degrees of freedom, engaged in questionable research practices, p-hacked, massaged our data—you pick the euphemism. In contrast, this new replication study followed the most up-to-date best practices in psychological science, eliminating room for flexibility in analysis or results interpretation."
   
   Social psychology really seems to be build on sand. I wonder how it'll continue in the future.
   
   https://www.speakandregret.michaelinzlicht.com/p/revisiting-stereotype-threat
   • LS (lain@lain.com)'s status on Friday, 20-Dec-2024 18:38:06 JST LS

     in reply to

     • akane
     @akane i wonder if there are non-mainstream schools in social psychology that don't have these issues.
   • akane (akane@vocalounge.cafe)'s status on Friday, 20-Dec-2024 18:38:11 JST akane

     in reply to

     @lain economist analogous statement when

   • mothball蛾玉 (和文化研究部) (moth_ball@shitposter.world)'s status on Friday, 20-Dec-2024 21:51:44 JST mothball蛾玉 (和文化研究部)

     in reply to
     @lain What they don't tell you is that the other fields have this as well, they just don't talk about it
     LS likes this.
   • billiam :4chan: (billiam@shitposter.world)'s status on Monday, 23-Dec-2024 05:45:10 JST billiam :4chan:

     in reply to

     • mothball蛾玉 (和文化研究部)
     @moth_ball @lain yep
     https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2020/06/25/on-trusting-academic-experts/
     LS likes this.