Conversation

Notices

1. :gura_sus: 1e+6 litres :flag_china: (kilostere@varishangout.net)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Nov-2024 04:59:21 JST :gura_sus: 1e+6 litres :flag_china:

   • 80085
   @80085
   citing yourself is even dumber, either you trust me or you dont, who cares where i said it first
   • :awoo_tired: shotgun snuggler :clownpiece_smug: likes this.
   • 80085 (80085@varishangout.net)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Nov-2024 05:07:56 JST 80085

     in reply to
     @kilostere my sources are fuck you trust me and if I get docked one more fucking time for forgetting a (# DIPSHIT) tag I am GOING TO FREAK
     :gura_sus: 1e+6 litres :flag_china: and :awoo_tired: shotgun snuggler :clownpiece_smug: like this.
   • :gura_sus: 1e+6 litres :flag_china: (kilostere@varishangout.net)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Nov-2024 05:17:49 JST :gura_sus: 1e+6 litres :flag_china:

     in reply to

     • 80085
     @80085
     the accepted peer review processes are incredibly retarded anyhow, most papers are meaningless slop
     when 90% of sources are unreliable or just flat lies, what point really is there
     
     modern soyence is whatever the majority wants to believe, reinforced by the standards that be :clownpiece_smug:
     
     be a good lad and write me a 5000 word paper on your favorite color with sources to back up your claims :turbo_point:
     being concise and reasonable is for peasants, not divine academia (my balls, 2008, pg. 32) :jahy_smart:
     :awoo_tired: shotgun snuggler :clownpiece_smug: likes this.
   • tomboy justice chan (rainignterror1080p@varishangout.net)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Nov-2024 06:26:37 JST tomboy justice chan

     in reply to

     • 80085
     @kilostere @80085 you could do it like how the media does it. make the fuck up and cite someone and then they cite you when some third party is trying to verify but on a mass scale so it's technically "verified" because mainstream sources said so
     :gura_sus: 1e+6 litres :flag_china: likes this.