@toolbear@notspookypip They’re not there to serve the community. They’re there to make a profit. They’re “just another” half-billion dollar for-profit “Silicon Valley tech company” wrapped in a not-for-profit public relations shell.
(Quotes from what their then head of public policy told me at a conference we were speaking at – “I don’t understand why you’re holding us to such a higher standard.”)
“When people show you who they are, believe them the first time.” – Maya Angelou
@notspookypip@aral The specific issue is them launching their own AI initiative, positioning themselves as uniquely suited to do it ethically. When what they're doing is chasing a fad.
They would better serve the community to invest the millions of dollars that they announced to fund this new mozilla[.]ai, instead into AI countermeasures to protect people from the unethical and dangerous state of the art.
The current AI push is VC desperation & snake oil after NFT and crypto collapsed.
There is no such thing as good Big Tech, yet Mozilla believes there is and wants to be a good Big Tech company. Mozilla isn't nearly as reformed as they imagine themselves to be. Mozilla imagines themselves ethical, but they are much closer to their tech bro origins than they admit to themselves or the world.
They took years to oust their homophobic CEO (who now runs the Brave Browser corp. so, you know, don't use that browser or boost that company).
@aral@toolbear oh wow... that's absolutely ignorant of them. And the head of public policy??? If they can't even try to be diplomatic about a response that's really bad...