> in a way I don't have to feel bad about hating Unix cultists since it's designers also did.
People doing cult shit are terrible, worse than useless. ( https://www.perl.com/pub/2000/12/advocacy.html/ ) Anything good and most bad stuff ends up with a team of Kool-Aid drinkers, though.
> A lot of recent programs have caught on to using 9P since it's still the best protocol for a lightweight file server out there.
@p Even as a big Lisp nut I still greatly admire the design of Plan 9, and in a way I don't have to feel bad about hating Unix cultists since it's designers also did.
When it's in the proper context of a network it's really intuitive to use, and the way it exploits the filesystem to do everything is genius. A lot of recent programs have caught on to using 9P since it's still the best protocol for a lightweight file server out there.
@Suiseiseki If you log in with Drawterm you can still edit remote files under /mnt/term with Emacs, FWIW.
> I tried plan 9, but it didn't even have GNU Emacs,
This is by design:
mushi% grep -i emacs /sys/games/lib/fortunes | sed 's/^/> /g' > The Blit is a nice terminal, but it runs emacs. > Any mail routed through "emacs" will probably fail without benefit of a bounce-back. > $ Editor (vi or emacs)? > GNU Emacs comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type C-h C-w for full details. > You may give out copies of Emacs; type C-h C-c to see the conditions. > Type C-h t for a tutorial on using Emacs. > Gnuemacs is portable except to machines that are too small. -Richard M. Stallman > I just want a bare-boned, straight EMACS. - Rae McLellan > emacs: Terminal type "emacs" is not powerful enough to run Emacs. > Promoting XEmacs from Editors to Red Hat Linux > If emacs buffers were limited to the size of memory, it would not be possible to edit /dev/mem. -tb@becket.net > One of the silliest things you can do with a modern Unix machine is run the Eliza mode of Emacs against random quotes from Zippy the Pinhead. - Eric Raymond > ssh, the emacs of network protocols > <jordanb#emacs@freenode.org> I think it's hilarious that you're doing xlib programming and your nick is 'kruhft' > The Importance of Being EMACS > Stallman saw a problem in too much customization and de-facto forking and set certain conditions for usage. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMACS > A security flaw in GNU Emacs' email subsystem was exploited by Markus Hess in his 1986 hacking spree to gain superuser access to Unix computers. > For me, the most dramatic example of the progress of hardware in the intervening years is Emacs. > rcirc on GNU Emacs 24.2.1 > As a programmer, I can make my programs do whatever I please. If I want to autosave all of my documents, I can write an Emacs script to save after every hundred keypresses. > Emacs Needs To Move To GitHub, Says ESR > To enter the computers, he exploited weaknesses such as a program called GNU Emacs that allowed mail users system administrator privileges under certain conditions. > Currently, vim also loads faster than Emacs. > Emacs now supports webkit.
:kenbw:
> The version I ran was full of GNU Emacs, GNU nano and a Xorg server.
I'm sorry to hear that and I hope things get better.
> You can only have an ultimate free software operating system if you include GNU.
This doesn't seem to be the case, as Plan 9 is the ultimate free software operating system.
> Only the 2014 version
The basis of ANTS and 9front, meaning that the derivative OSs are all GPL. You can't revoke the GPL, and the original owners have ceased maintenance.
> Unless utilities can output usage instructions and the license, in Japanese too if you wish, they're no good.