This year I shot 24 rolls of 35mm film and 15 rolls of 120... So far, at least.
Conversation
Notices
-
Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 20:58:58 JST Eugen Rochko -
dansup (dansup@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:08:12 JST dansup @Gargron Iconic! There is something about film that digital can't reproduce!
-
GJ Groothedde 🇪🇺 (eetschrijver@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:09:17 JST GJ Groothedde 🇪🇺 @Gargron Wow, 120. I didn't even think that still existed.
-
Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:21:08 JST Eugen Rochko If you want to see a selection of my work, you can visit my portfolio: https://eugenrochko.com/
-
Alex Camilleri (alexkalopsia@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:27:45 JST Alex Camilleri @Gargron are you using a specific CMS?
Sharing some of my work (need to update blog and portfolio so that I also get that cool "More from" :) )
-
Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:30:08 JST Eugen Rochko @alexkalopsia No, I coded a custom website with React/Next.js.
In conversation permalink -
Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:34:30 JST Eugen Rochko @shevek What a depressing view. The process is at least as important as the end result.
In conversation permalink -
⁂ Shevek ⁂ (shevek@mstdn.io)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:34:31 JST ⁂ Shevek ⁂ @Gargron Sorry, but I can't see the point shooting with chemical films, then develop them, then make copies, then digitize the copies/negative.
It is more straight forward shooting with digital machine. All steps reduced in one.
In conversation permalink -
Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:40:32 JST Eugen Rochko @sandor Canon AE-1 Program, Pentax KX and Pentax 6x7. I note the gear on every photo.
In conversation permalink -
Sandor (sandor@social.appbakery.ee)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:40:33 JST Sandor @Gargron what rifle did you use?
In conversation permalink -
Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:44:51 JST Eugen Rochko @shevek I don't see uploading to the web as the goal of photography, but as a side effect. I keep all my negatives and I print some of them.
In conversation permalink -
⁂ Shevek ⁂ (shevek@mstdn.io)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:44:52 JST ⁂ Shevek ⁂ @Gargron I've been traditional photographer. I used to shoot slides.
So I understand the magic of chemical photography for itself, but I don't understand the use of chemical films if the goal is uploading to web. For this purpose digital cameras are the right way, IMHO.
In conversation permalink -
⁂ Shevek ⁂ (shevek@mstdn.io)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:51:27 JST ⁂ Shevek ⁂ @Gargron This is a possible answer I was thinking of. The other is, that perhaps scanning a negative yields better results, nowadays, than right shoot with mid-quality DSLR.
In conversation permalink -
Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:51:27 JST Eugen Rochko @shevek Negatives have insane resolution, that's true. And a used analog camera is much cheaper than a DSLR that shoots comparable resolution.
In conversation permalink -
Karl Ramberg (karlramberg@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 23:32:38 JST Karl Ramberg @Gargron Mastodon-photographers unite!
In conversation permalink -
Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 04-Nov-2024 04:22:12 JST Eugen Rochko @indutny Pentax 6x7
In conversation permalink -
Fedor Indutny (indutny@fosstodon.org)'s status on Monday, 04-Nov-2024 04:22:13 JST Fedor Indutny @Gargron what do you shoot 120 with?
In conversation permalink
-