There is no such thing as a bad Linux distro except Hannah Montana Linux. No, I take it back. That award goes to the bastardized version of Linux called WSL.
Conversation
Notices
-
nixCraft 🐧 (nixcraft@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Oct-2024 00:32:46 JST nixCraft 🐧 -
Ma10gan ♠️ (ma10gan@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Oct-2024 00:36:04 JST Ma10gan ♠️ @nixCraft It's not even a "Windows Subsystem for Linux"; it's a Linux subsystem for Windows.
-
sobkas (sobkas@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Oct-2024 00:54:32 JST sobkas @nixCraft Well it's a bit shitty, but it is still better than Windows it uses as bootloader.
-
wbftw (wbftw@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Oct-2024 01:34:26 JST wbftw @nixCraft Not a WSL(2) user, but have spoken to a couple of peeps who are or were in the past. Their view was WSL > MacOSX for development, esp. if containers are involved.
-
HoracioDos (horaciodos@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 31-Oct-2024 18:24:54 JST HoracioDos @nixCraft Had too many issues with WSL, so I finally switched to VirtualBox. Plus, WSL requires installing additional software over time. Now I just start my headless Fedora VM from powershell. No GUI needed. BTW I've updated to 41 last night.
-