Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Popular
- People

Conversation

Notices

Richard MacManus (ricmac@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 19-Oct-2024 17:57:12 JST Richard MacManus

This definition of the fediverse as including Bluesky is, I think, a good one. But as with Threads, the true test will be whether Bluesky users can follow someone from Mastodon. Frankly that looks more likely to happen soon with Bluesky than Threads, via bridging tech. Perhaps Mastodon and Bluesky will continue to diverge though in use case — personally I love the usenet / discussion board vibe of Mastodon, but I might use Bluesky to consume memes, etc. https://www.threads.net/@mmccue/post/DBSmyQqp9y-
In conversation about a month ago from mastodon.social permalink
Attachments
1. Mike McCue (@mmccue) on Threads
  
  I think the fediverse / open social web is the sum total of all users running on an open social protocol. Activitypub and AT Proto have the same mission. They’re already being bridged. And the user experiences that evolve here will ultimately be more and more unified. Overall it’s great for the fediverse that both Threads and Bluesky are growing and people are fleeing X.
- Aral Balkan (aral@mastodon.ar.al)'s status on Saturday, 19-Oct-2024 17:57:12 JST Aral Balkan
  in reply to
  
  @ricmac Indeed, I mean you can’t have a proper environmentalist movement without involving ExxonMobil and Shell, after all.
  
  In conversation about a month ago permalink

Feeds