Conversation

Notices

1. Zichqec (zichqec@ukadon.shillest.net)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Oct-2024 11:05:44 JST Zichqec

   Am I misremembering how RAND works, or is the documentation on AYAYA wrong...? I thought if you put in RAND without an argument, it would generate numbers up to the integer limit :meow_thinking:

   I tested it on a ghost with an older version of YAYA too, and it seems to be behaving the same there...

   • ぽな (C.Ponapalt) (ponapalt@ukadon.shillest.net)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Oct-2024 11:05:44 JST ぽな (C.Ponapalt)

     in reply to

     @Zichqec The manual was incorrect. My apologies.

     If the parameter is omitted, the result is RAND(100).

   • Zichqec (zichqec@ukadon.shillest.net)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Oct-2024 11:07:59 JST Zichqec

     in reply to

     • ぽな (C.Ponapalt)

     @ponapalt Thank you! That's good to know, I must have mixed up RAND with something else, or I have a false memory :meow_thinking:

   • ぽな (C.Ponapalt) (ponapalt@ukadon.shillest.net)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Oct-2024 11:12:06 JST ぽな (C.Ponapalt)

     in reply to

     @Zichqec

     https://emily.shillest.net/ayaya/?cmd=diff&page=%E3%83%9E%E3%83%8B%E3%83%A5%E3%82%A2%E3%83%AB/%E9%96%A2%E6%95%B0/RAND

     It seems that someone wrote wrong RAND document a long time ago.

     I think I am not verifying this document enough, because the YAYA source code says it behave same as RAND(100) if parameter is omitted. Sorry.

   • Zichqec (zichqec@ukadon.shillest.net)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Oct-2024 11:15:18 JST Zichqec

     in reply to

     • ぽな (C.Ponapalt)

     @ponapalt It seems this information made it into my YAYA guide as well, apparently I didn't vet it properly :meow_thinking: I should have checked that too, so it's on me as well.

     I'm still planning to go through and do some work on AYAYA when I have time, I'll try to test stuff and note any discrepancies that I find