Conversation
Notices
-
💀💀💀 :0080: c̷̨̢̛̲̼̞̞͓̹͚̗̼͓͚͖͒̔̓̃̈̋̂́̏̆̐̐̈́̉͘͜ȑ̴̫͔͂̌̔̆̓͛͗́͐̍̃́̆ÿ̷̤̺̳̖͖͚͈́̄́͌͒͂͊͗̄̔̚p̶̢̧͇̞̯͍͇̤̖͖̙̫̪͋̏̃̃͗̎͜͝t̶͖̉̽̐̇i̴̭̜̼͖̬̽̀͆̃̓̂̚͝ͅc̸̡͙̪͎̫͚̫̘̱͚͔̫̣̣̒̃̋͜͝ 💀💀💀 :verified: (newt@stereophonic.space)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Sep-2024 01:54:59 JST 💀💀💀 :0080: c̷̨̢̛̲̼̞̞͓̹͚̗̼͓͚͖͒̔̓̃̈̋̂́̏̆̐̐̈́̉͘͜ȑ̴̫͔͂̌̔̆̓͛͗́͐̍̃́̆ÿ̷̤̺̳̖͖͚͈́̄́͌͒͂͊͗̄̔̚p̶̢̧͇̞̯͍͇̤̖͖̙̫̪͋̏̃̃͗̎͜͝t̶͖̉̽̐̇i̴̭̜̼͖̬̽̀͆̃̓̂̚͝ͅc̸̡͙̪͎̫͚̫̘̱͚͔̫̣̣̒̃̋͜͝ 💀💀💀 :verified: @pixel i think they mean making derived software, not github forks. - † top dog :pedomustdie: likes this.
-
Andy (pixel@desu.social)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Sep-2024 01:55:01 JST Andy Funniest bit:
"Forking is not allowed" vs. "Contributions encouraged"
On GitHub, that requires a fork however 🤔
or do they want us to use git send-email?
-
Andy (pixel@desu.social)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Sep-2024 01:55:02 JST Andy So far:
* License was probably not lawyered, so it contradicts itself a lot, even though they probably meant "redistributions need to drop all branding and attachment to Winamp" which is fair
* The license violates GitHub terms of service, because the ToS grant the right to fork for every public repository
* The source includes commercial or non-distributable libraries
* SHOUTcast server side code is included in the repo (lol???) -
Andy (pixel@desu.social)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Sep-2024 01:55:03 JST Andy The Winamp source code is here!
(and it has a horrendous license that people are rightfully complaining about already)