Conversation

Notices

1. xianc78@gameliberty.club's status on Tuesday, 10-Sep-2024 08:25:07 JST xianc78

   • :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans:
   • Pawlicker
   • expired oyster card reseller :deifirev:
   • microdosing beer

   @Pawlicker @allison @ensix @penny You can still profit off of AGPL code. Look at Mastodon instances like Pawoo or Librem Social.

   • xianc78@gameliberty.club's status on Tuesday, 10-Sep-2024 08:39:26 JST xianc78

     in reply to

     • :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans:
     • Pawlicker
     • expired oyster card reseller :deifirev:
     • microdosing beer

     @allison @ensix @Pawlicker @penny My point is that all FOSS licenses allow anyone to profit off of the software, including the AGPL. There are "anti-capitalist" licenses out there that prohibit privately owned companies from using the software (only allowing worker co-ops and individuals), but they are by definition, not FOSS.

     https://anticapitalist.software/

     There are also so called "ethical software licenses" that restrict other uses like using the software to "promote hate". Basically making them no different than EULAs. There was a small surge of these movements ever since far-leftists threw Stallman under the bus.

     https://ethicalsource.dev/licenses/

   • :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans: (allison@hidamari.apartments)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Sep-2024 08:39:27 JST :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans:

     in reply to

     • Pawlicker
     • expired oyster card reseller :deifirev:
     • microdosing beer
     @xianc78 @Pawlicker @ensix @penny Or more infamously, the likes of Artifex GhostScript and Berkeley DB.