Fuck you Sama and your shity AI company. You are stealing from artists plain and simple. Nobody asked you to do this. Nothing of value will be lost today if your company shuts down. OpenAI is begging the British Parliament to allow it to use copyrighted works because it's supposedly "impossible" for the company to train its artificial intelligence models without using copyrighted material — and continue growing its multi-billion-dollar business — without them. https://futurism.com/the-byte/openai-copyrighted-material-parliament
These companies need to be fined for heating up plants, too. They are now using way too much energy to write poems and make pictures using LLM. I have never seen such short-sighted and entitled billionaire individuals. They don’t want to pay artists. They want to destroy the planet.
@nixCraft When poor people can't afford a movie or a book, then screw them. And let the god's hand protect them if they try to download what they can't buy anyway. When a rich guy can't pay for media he processes en masse, that's a boo-hoo poor little dude...
Every argument against AI is just an argument against capitalism: AI is nothing but gasoline, the raging bonfire of capitalism is the thing to put out…
I agree a company should not be making money with AI.. if we just ban “companies” from AI, I think that would be the best case.
The argument training data is a violation of copyright has some really dystopian downstream effects we should all avoid. Seeing/viewing art isn’t stealing art.
@nixCraft If your business model is based on you not following the law, your business is organized crime. Companies should have to accommodate for regulations and laws, not the other way around.
It’s not impossible, just expensive. Just pay for the data.
If he’s granted the ability to just steal copyrighted data then every data product of OpenAI - from output to source code to correspondence - should be required to be released to the public domain and offered free of charge so that they play by the same rules.
If our data output is taken without reimbursement so too should be anything created from it. If our data ownership means nothing then neither should theirs.
@nixCraft "Limiting training data to public domain books and drawings created more than a century ago might yield an interesting experiment, but would not provide AI systems that meet the needs of today's citizens."
The audacity to think that humanity, that survived and thrived for thousands of years NEEDS AI for anything.
I want OpenAI to be forced to pay for every copyrighted material it ever stole. I assume the price would be in the billions.