Conversation
Notices
-
@faggotracist1488
>as for drawings and shit, most good instances don't care, i don't care
List those out. Only baest comes to mind and maybe some very small instances. Most instances do care, just from that fact hosting lolicon in a media proxy potentially opens them up to feds knocking on their door, because lolicon is legally in a gray area in US and outright banned where I live. I don't want Czech glowies knocking at my door with a signed DSA from EUtards just because some feds decided it would be a nice idea to scrape my posts and check who I interact with in some random threads.
That mint, few other admins and I are the only ones that are more vocal about this does not mean that others don't care.
This behavior just shows how extremely selfish you are. You are public nuisance to instance owners.
>i don't know if you think i'm retarded or what but telling me to go to pedos when i'm not one is just weird
You are both of those and it isn't weird.
You already claimed multiple times that you talk to them and that you don't see any problems with that. That makes you a part of their community.
You said multiple times that sexualized drawings of children (ie lolicon) are fine because those don't hurt anyone (probably also in this thread that I didn't bother reading fully). This is the typical argument pedos use and that makes a one.
You repeated toddlercon at least once which caused one of the threads in the screenshots above (the one where you said you are meta-ironic or whatever.) Which solidifies that you are one.
>unrealistic drawings are somehow the same as literal rape but like, nah, it's just not bro.
It's not rape, it's the fact that sexualizing children even in cartoon form is disgusting. There's no ifs there. It's unacceptable behavior in a civilized society. That's the point that everybody tried to get through your thick skull.