What? qt6 is a library and the DevTerm is ARM. If you are talking about the screenshot, that's old, that's qt4, I think. I used to use luakit, so I had to build qt back then, too.
"x64" is not real, and it's a stupid coinage: 8086, 80286, 80386, 80486, these are x86 CPUs. The 64-bit ISA is called, depending, AMD-64 or x86-64. Microsoft came up with "x64" because "AMD-64" had AMD's name in it, "x86-64" has too many SCARY NUMBERS, and changing "32" to "64" in "IA-32" wouldn't work because the "I" part is no longer true.
> You can also place ram usage limits on your apps
Did you just send someone that has been using Linux since the 90s a StackOverflow link where the only piece of information is the ulimit man page? Do kids these days actually not know how to type `man ulimit`? Do you call /bin/sh an "app"?
:tyrellshades: Why don't you like these pipes? :elliotthinking: Because they leak. :tyrellshades: Show me where it leaks! :elliotmanic2: Here, here, here... :tyrellshades: But duct tape is so cheap! :elliot: ...
Nothing you are telling me makes C++ less shitty to use. None of it makes C++ programs less shitty.
> It's on the todo list try it out.
I am not a fan.
> Good thing you didn't see how cancerous VB.net was.
I lived through it. I had already ditched Windows for Linux by then. I saw happy99 and Code Red and nimda and Slammer in the news. (And happy99 in my inbox.) I was there.
C++ was already shit in 1998 and it has not gotten any smaller or more manageable. That is 26 years ago. I don't know what you write, maybe C++ makes sense for you, it has never made any sense for anything I have ever written in my life and 1998 is before most people on fedi were born.
NetBSD supports VAX still. Wonder if they've dropped Itanic.
> That said, Itanium's spirit lives on in Elbrus/E2K, partially fueled by my tax money.
The, uh...
> The Elbrus 2000 (or e2k; Russian: Эльбрус 2000) is a Russian 512-bit wide VLIW microprocessor developed by Moscow Center of SPARC Technologies (MCST) and fabricated by TSMC.
Holy fucking shit.
> the Elbrus 2000 architecture implements dynamic data type-checking during execution.
This is actually kinda cool. It seems like something that'd run better as a coprocessor, though. Like, even on a conventional CPU, 90% of the time (90%!) is spent waiting for the memory bus. 20 instructions per clock would have to be way worse. So a regular CPU doing the regular CPU stuff for an OS with this insane VLIW coprocessor, that would be pretty cool.