Don't you just like it when web #archiving sites encounter an #HTTP 505 when using #HTTP2 and not be smart about it like trying again with HTTP/1 :seija_coffee:
Tbf the spec doesn't say anything about what clients should do when they encounter 505, so I'm blaming the HTTP/2 (and HTTP/3!) spec writers for not extending that status code to allow fallback (which is an encouraged behavior!)
Also if you're thinking of being clever and have the server respond with a 426 with Upgrade: HTTP/1.1, that won't work because HTTP/2 has removed support for the Upgrade header