Conversation
Notices
-
@Diceynes Whether I agree with the climate change narrative as it stands today, which I don't for a multitude of reasons, I just found the juxtaposition funny.
On the one hand they are claiming you can't shift the burden of proof to others for a claim of fact, on the other they are pointing to the "97%!!!" narrative. If you know anything about that narrative you know that there were plenty of people who were reputable at their time who were just deemed "wrong" with no supporting evidence (or worse the "muh 97%" shtick) and unceremoniously dumped from academia in order to hold up the narrative.
But even if that's wrong, all their predictions have been false. Let us not forget "underwater by 2010/2020". And even if THAT is not convincing enough, their whole argument here is an appeal to authority and popularity. You cannot claim a refutation of one fallacy by using another.
Also this is of course the same group who will claim God CANNOT exist (not only does not) and then talks about a fucking tea kettle in space.