"It has become so unfashionable to speak up about the human aspects of communism that Americans who feel deeply about com- munist oppression have too often been des- ignated as fanatics or right-wingers. We saw a sad example of this in American newspa- pers this week. Press accounts of the unfor- tunate and deplorable attack that was made on Premier Kosygin in Ottawa, labeled the Hungarian Freedom Fighters Federation as a quote, "right-wing group." I totally reject such a label, and you should reject it. Are the freedom fighters right wing because they lived under communism and fought to free themselves? Are they right wing because they want the world to know what life under communism is like?
This convenient kind of labeling is dan- gerous to our society. I am very far from being right wing, or even a conservative Con- gressman. Yet, I have been fighting for nine years in Congress and in my home commu- nity to make Americans think about the meaning of communism from the standpoint of human freedom."
"In the 1970's it is insufficient simply to at- tack or defend Communism. We must know it: what moral, economic, mllitary forces, what psychological modes hold tt together; what new concepts, meeaasures see the light of day, what sort of language the Commu- nists use, that is understood differently by them and by us.
While there is no longer a single strong authoritarian leader who speaks for and rules over all Communists, with its present polycentrism, Communism presents an equal- ly great threat to free societies. The aim of Communism is still the domination of the world by elimination of free political sys- tems and their transformation into funda- mentally totalitarian Communist rule. The leaders of Communism reconfirm this goal day by day.
Communist strategy, 1n order to achieve this goal may have been changed. The nature of confrontation may be shifted from . a primarily military arena to the ideological battlefield. We here in the West are much bet- ter prepared to cope with the articulate mili- tary threat than with the shapeless and deceptive tactics of ideological warfare.
The realization of the consequences of nuclear warfare has increased the prudence of the Communists leaders, but has not made them any more ready to abide the U.N. Dec- laration of Human Rights or the Atlantic Charter than they did earlier. There is the problem of internal discontent in commu- nist countries, moreover, which makes the Soviets less adventurous; however the West has not tried to use this discontent to force the Communists to implement the very prin- ciples Of the two mentioned documents and help restore self-determination among those nations which are deprived this right by their Soviet rulers.
Instead a staunch refusal to exacerbate the problems has been expressed. One can- not ignore the dehumanizing, aggressive ideology of the Communist powers and their military institution which threaten the rest of the world. One cannot dream of coexist- ence and react only episodically to crises. Systematic long term planning-based on the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights and the Atlantic Charter-is needed to help hu- manize the governments of the oppressed nations and restore lost freedoms in coun- tries now occupied by foreign troops and foreign ideologies"
compare and contrast this to
2000: "you're either with us or against us" or 'it's not OK to even say "it's OK to be white" '
Most normal people *can* read the things you really want to know about Covid-19 in 10 or 20 minutes a day, I agree. People who want to have some expertise can read more, like anything else.