I am unfollowing @aral. No matter my disagreements with GNOME folks in the past, COSMIC and GNOME are going to end up with the same accessibility backend, @accesskit, developed by the amazing @matt. Thanks to funding gathered by @gnome from @sovtechfund, rapid advances are being made in Wayland-compatible accessibility features. Let's stop concern trolling each other and instead work on building a better free software world for everyone.
@thestrangelet@lucasmz It doesn't feel genuine when someone targets others who are supposedly on your side, calling them things like "ableist" for not having finished their work. It reminds me of having been called a racist by Lunduke for supporting DEI...
@soller@lucasmz Definitely your prerogative to unfollow, but I'm sure there are quite a few things y'all agree on. I respect that he's advocating for folks that are are underrepresented in FOSS.
@soller@thestrangelet@lucasmz Do you know how long Wayland has been default on Fedora? I just looked it up. Since Fedora 25. For eight years. I hadn’t even realised. EIGHT YEARS, Fedora has been shipping GNOME with a broken screen reader!
And hundred-million-dollar corporations like IBM & Canonical ship operating systems today based on GNOME with a broken screen readers.
Why do I say “ableist?” Because this can only happen in an ableist culture.
@soller@thestrangelet@lucasmz You can unfollow and publicly shame me for calling out a glaring accessibility issue in nearly every major Linux distribution on the planet. What you can’t do is both do that and argue that there isn’t an ableist culture in open source software because you’re literally perpetuating it right now by showing the next person exactly what happens when someone criticises the lack of accessibility in your community.
@soller@thestrangelet@lucasmz This might be shocking, but deprioritizing the needs of disabled users over mainstream features is the definition of ableism. This is not a breaking change in a minor version that is quickly fixed, it’s years of excluding people. It’s the result of a systematic ableist process in an ableist world, carried out by people with (probably, hopefully) unconscious biases of exclusion.
@aral There are proven effective ways to persuade people to work together to solve and address problems. You are not using them.
I'm going to bow out, though. No one likes to hear the kumbaya bullshit because no one wants to think about how they can change what they're doing themselves.
Everyone wants to start with what everyone else is doing wrong. See? I'm doing it too.
Fedi is a place to yell at other people, less so a place to collaborate.
@gvlx No sympathy for criticism of eight years of excluding disabled people from your operating system = sympathy for eight years of excluding people from your operating system.
Petition hundred-million dollar corporation to care about making their products accessible? I beg to differ. You *regulate* them. You *fine* them if they don’t.
(Of course, under capitalism, all that is, to varying degrees, theoretical.)
So, no, sorry, I won’t be whispering ‘please sirs, be kind’ anytime soon.
"I'm really impressed by how much the screen reader has continued to offer the same utility release after release"
"It's really notable that where other products might seek to just comply blindly like the sheep they are with accessibility laws and requirements in their commercial products. Where Fedora really excels is in going their own way, despite big government over-reach"
@gvlx@aral In what world could a (legitimate!) concern or criticism be phrased positively? They are negative by definition. You just want to silence critics.
@katanova@aral@soller@thestrangelet@lucasmz I'm a blind person. I am forced to use microsoft, google and apple products because those are accessible and Linux, a FOSS flagship apparently, isn't. I'm done begging the sighties.
As I see it, @aral has been calling out ableist behaviors, not arbitrarily labeling people, and most certainly not @matt (prove me wrong).
The worst part of ableism in software development is to treat accessibility as yet another "requirement" in the list that consistently gets ranked down, kind of a bonus of grace. Like with pushing out Wayland fully knowing that this will exclude people.
It seems to be hard to imagine for some what this means for people depending on features like e.g. a screen reader that is fully functional, and works during installation already. And sometimes this ignorance shows in very disappointing statements and replies.
@soller@thestrangelet@lucasmz I can sympathise with that, but the sticking point for @aral I think is that this isn't just unfinished work lacking a few features, but rather unfinished work that's remained unfinished for so long *while still being used as the default* for years. This decision, that an unfinished product lacking fundamental #a11y functionality was "good enough to ship" is an ableist one.
@soller@thestrangelet@lucasmz Ableist is neither a slur nor a description of your intention. As with other types of discrimination, it can happen without intending it. I dare to say its probably mostly ignorance and indifference. The outcome is the same though, disabled people can't participate and thats a bad thing for them and society.
@gvlx@aral#JustBeNice, really? Because we know that people in power always happily change their ways when you are “just nice”. Because nobody asked nicely when the regression happened almost a decade ago? Because people whose human rights are violated are supposed to “just ask nicely”.
In what world does that work? It’s on the OS projects to lobby for the resources they need to make a functioning product.
@gvlx While I hate to pile on, it’s important to understand that the messge is from frustration with the ongoing and genuine harm that these kinds of barriers introduce.
It is valid to be angry and suggesting otherwise is dismissive of that community experience as a whole. That dismissiveness is part of the problem. Your lack of sympathy as well.
Historically, accessibility affordances only come after using this kind of advocacy. Which sucks.
> From the actually-what-you’re-referring-to-as-ableism-is-GNU/ableism department
Quoted the blanket statement.
Not only that, but the post complains that a Fedora maintainer said that patches are welcome, and yet the first instinct in response to that is to want to block them? Not a productive attitude.
If you care about the problem, then instead of calling people abliest, go help the people who are working on this problem. GNOME is backing AccessKit, which will be in COSMIC.
@aral is pointing out the simple fact that companies with a quite decent overall budget are pushing out essential software that excludes people who had been better supported before. As everybody trying out accessibility features under Wayland vs. x11 can easily experience.
Nowhere is he posting blanket statements like your "people are not supporting accessibility". These are your misrepresentations of what he is saying.
@thestrangelet@lucasmz It isn't the opposite. Aral is twisting words to claim people are not supporting accessibility. Everyone involved wants it to be better, so why throw around words like ableist?