SCOTUS rejects challenge to abortion pill for lack of standing
The anti-abortion defendants are not injured by the FDA's actions on mifepristone.
SCOTUS rejects challenge to abortion pill for lack of standing
The anti-abortion defendants are not injured by the FDA's actions on mifepristone.
@arstechnica SCOTUS seems to flip-flop on standing and stare decisus
@arstechnica Thank you for writing a headline that makes clear this was dismissed on standing, not merit! Absolutely hate the misleading oversimplification rampant in media you've avoided here.
The Supreme Court did not rule on Mifeprestone. It did not legalize Mifeprestone. It did not uphold any laws guaranteeing access to Mifeprestone. It simply made a technical ruling on whether these litigants had standing to bring suit.
Thank you for helping to make this clear, right up front.
@arstechnica When *THIS* Supreme Court can't support something that would help anti-abortionists, you *KNOW* the legal standing is bad!
076萌SNS is a social network, courtesy of 076. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-beta0, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All 076萌SNS content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.