Conversation

Notices

1. ≠ (amerika@annihilation.social)'s status on Saturday, 08-Jun-2024 19:01:46 JST ≠

   in reply to

   • h4890
   • argumento :socialiststar:
   • Vector Hugo
   • somekindahate3
   @h4890 @israel @palestine @gfkdsgn @argumento @somekindahate3
   
   Or do voting by household. Married people with stable work tend to vote more sanely.
   
   However, in the end, as long as wealth transfer is allowed, government will destroy its host civilization.
   • h4890 (h4890@liberdon.com)'s status on Saturday, 08-Jun-2024 19:01:47 JST h4890

     • argumento :socialiststar:
     • Vector Hugo
     • somekindahate3

     @amerika @israel @palestine @gfkdsgn @argumento @somekindahate3

     That's an interesting observation too. When many young people start to work many discard socialism. I think another protection could be increasing the voting age to 20 or 25 to make sure you have enoug life experience.

     Alternatively, only people who work get to vote, and if you live off the government, you are not allowed to vote.

     With those two changes I think the support of socialism would be cut in half.