Conversation

Notices

1. Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 08-Jun-2024 03:10:10 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq.
   "Errrrrm the killdozer guy was bad because [turgid overwrought wordcel copepost]"
   
   It's almost like the core point of lionizing the guy was because there's a story of a presumably normal White guy who just snaps because of a dysfunctional society
   
   "B-but that's not what happened!"
   
   You dumb niggers have no conception of the power of The Myth(tm) and that's hilarious to me
   • Ardainian Hebrew Israelite and Weaf :jv::nv: like this.
   • Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 08-Jun-2024 03:10:51 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq.

     in reply to

     • sapphire
     Him and his goons did kill maybe a couple dozen (innocent, even by his own stated metric) White people, but I digress.
     
     The point is, brown is a mythological figure for the leftist. The story invented around him transcends historical fact; it is platonic, it is ideal, facts or intentions or anything else be damned.
     Weaf :jv::nv: likes this.
   • sapphire (sapphire@shortstacksran.ch)'s status on Saturday, 08-Jun-2024 03:10:52 JST sapphire

     in reply to
     @doctorsex John Brown didn't even do anything except probably little boys, he failed miserably like all soyboy leftists do
   • Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 08-Jun-2024 03:10:53 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq.

     in reply to
     "Guuuuuhhh why don't leftists disavow john brown, don't they know he didn't even kill that many slave owners; think of the hypocrisy!"
   • Weaf :jv::nv: (weaf@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 08-Jun-2024 03:13:19 JST Weaf :jv::nv:

     in reply to
     @doctorsex Omw to deboonk Jessie James to own the myth enjoyers
   • yockeypuck (yockeypuck@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 08-Jun-2024 06:47:31 JST yockeypuck

     in reply to

     • Weaf :jv::nv:
     @weaf @doctorsex It's not that I don't understand you. It's that I do, I know plenty like you, and I don't respect you. I scanned your timeline, you have no where near enough meaningful or cool contributions to justify your dedication to your persona or for me to believe that you are worthwhile ally. It's not even claimed to be ironic. You're just another enthusiastic weebslop consumer with a sensitivite spot for criticism.
     
     You were a cunt to me and so I pointed out that it's ironic that your dedicated cringe persona wants to nitpick me over a single use of charged semantics. I didn't call you a pedophile, and yet here you are dunking. What's your motivation then? I went out of my way to agree with someone, who I don't even like btw, over common ground , you followed up by arguing with me.
     
     You also didn't make sure to rule out the prominent "traps aren't gay" sector with your semantic suggestion, and then proceeded to accuse me of being a fed troon.
     
     Basically your entire existence and arguments are just wrong.
     
     Thanks for the argument though. Oddly satisfying. Ill give you the benefit that the brain chemistry was your true motivation all along, if you'd prefer to stop here and skip the questions.