Conversation

Notices

1. santiago (insufrible) (santiagolmtz@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 04-Jun-2024 01:32:38 JST santiago (insufrible)
   Has anyone here read MILES MATHIS' BLOG?
   • xianc78@gameliberty.club's status on Tuesday, 04-Jun-2024 01:32:37 JST xianc78

     in reply to

     @santiagolmtz All the time.

   • xianc78@gameliberty.club's status on Tuesday, 04-Jun-2024 02:26:48 JST xianc78

     in reply to

     @santiagolmtz I just wish he would be open to interviews for shows like The Corbett Report or Red Ice, but he it seems like he assumes that most other people are controlled opposition.

   • santiago (insufrible) (santiagolmtz@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 04-Jun-2024 02:26:49 JST santiago (insufrible)

     in reply to

     • xianc78
     @xianc78 Somehow he's one of the most based conspiracy theorists even if it turns out he's wrong. I haven't had the time to verify his physics theories but aren't not plausible.
   • santiago (insufrible) (santiagolmtz@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Jun-2024 00:29:28 JST santiago (insufrible)

     in reply to

     • xianc78
     @xianc78 Agree, although i think Corbett wouldn't be interested in interviewing him, even if he agreed with him because it would alienate many viewers, and i think from his point of view, the conspiracy since the last two centuries has been insulting enough to make anyone want to do something, that and that it is more urgent.
     
     I still personally don't know if i agree with many of the things he says but he's got a point on the famous people. The mass media has been coopted since forever (at least until the internet age and it is still coopted in many ways), and it would pretty much be impossible to become famous if you don't have their backing.
     
     I don't think this is the case with Corbett, i just guess he doesn't want to drastically change his narrative (at least not yet) for the reasons i explained above.
     xianc78 likes this.
   • xianc78@gameliberty.club's status on Thursday, 06-Jun-2024 01:46:57 JST xianc78

     in reply to

     @santiagolmtz I did some searching and it looks like at least one of Miles Mathis's guest writers thinks James Corbett is controlled opposition, but I don't think he/she provides significant enough evidence, just pointing out last name connections which could mean anything (IMDB, a source that Mathis typically cites, doesn't show anything), and it's from one of his guest writers, not Mathis himself.

     http://mileswmathis.com/gbn.pdf (page 7)

     I do see Mathis's articles linked in the comments on The Corbett Report. James doesn't seem to delete them, and James openly claims that you shouldn't put full faith into him. I don't think a controlled-op would say that. That doesn't mean that everything he says is right though.

     Both the mainstream and most of the alternative news outlets refuse to acknowledge the existence of Miles Mathis, even though clearly some of their articles or videos were made as a response, like the ones responding to the Stephen Hawking report. They just don't mention his name. News outlets will write hit pieces on Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan, Keith Woods, and Red Ice TV all day and mention their names, but they pretend that Mathis doesn't even exist.

     I mean even the alternative press won't respond to Mathis's hit pieces on them. You'd think Red Ice who always responds to hit pieces on them would respond to Mathis claiming that they are CIA fronts, but they don't. All of this tells me that he is probably on to at least something that both the mainstream and controlled alternative media doesn't want to admit.

     http://mileswmathis.com/berg.pdf

   • santiago (insufrible) (santiagolmtz@gleasonator.com)'s status on Friday, 07-Jun-2024 01:28:07 JST santiago (insufrible)

     in reply to

     • xianc78
     @xianc78
     
     Yeah i think Corbett just isn't that well informed on the subject of jews and maybe is being cautious on the jewish question, antisemitism, as understood by Gerry (ancient spook theorist from ancient-spooks.com who's based a significant part of his work on Miles') is after all just another spook trick to misdirect attention from the secret aristocracy to a minority they created to camouflage themselves.
     
     I do think he's onto something with the celebrities stuff but at least some of them might not be spook agents and are just not that well informed or busy or fooled-by-spooks enough to not know the full extent of the spook network.
     
     Anyway I personally don't know yet if i agree with the full extent of the Miles' theory, some famous people are known to be agents, if not directly spook agents, at least CIA's. Many ought to be just obliged to follow the current Big Media enforced narrative, they are probably fooled just like the rest of us, they don't need to be directly connected to ancient spooks, although some of them (who turn out to be especially influential) might be. This being said i can't discard Miles' theory completly either.
     xianc78 likes this.