Conversation

Notices

1. 🎄 Rick 🎄 (praxisofevil@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 03-Jun-2024 12:56:33 JST 🎄 Rick 🎄

   New substack is up, I talk about sex this time

   https://open.substack.com/pub/praxisofevil/p/tired-of-sex?r=1h7crx&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

   • Xenophon :demon_wojak: (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 03-Jun-2024 12:56:30 JST Xenophon :demon_wojak:

     in reply to

     • synapsid
     Good write up. I would add that a lot of this can chajge when youre in a committed relationship. It isnt necessarily about political ideology, but sex is designed to be an emotional connection as well as physical, with a person you share intimacy with. When you use sex as a tool to bust a nut, it will eventually feel shallow and empty.
     
     The thing that saddens me is not that many men aren't having sex, but that they lack the partner they were supposed to have, and lack that emotional connection that comes with it. From there you can have as much or little sex as you want, because it now has value to both of you and isnt commodified.
     Kenny Blankenship likes this.
   • synapsid (synapsid@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 03-Jun-2024 12:56:31 JST synapsid

     in reply to
     I liked your article, but given current normgroid sexual views are directly descendant from libtardism and atheism prevalent in the 60s, I think the two are tightly coupled and ought to be discussed together. Nothing wrong with keeping it short and focused. :anya_salute:
   • 🎄 Rick 🎄 (praxisofevil@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 03-Jun-2024 12:56:31 JST 🎄 Rick 🎄

     in reply to

     • synapsid

     @synapsid I'm trying to write more short form stuff instead of stretching everything out to 3000 words, and I'm trying to be more concise. I agree with your point about the relationship between liberalism and sex, but this piece was more a commentary about women's role in it.

   • synapsid (synapsid@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 03-Jun-2024 12:56:32 JST synapsid

     in reply to
     >They did this because of the mindset that guys who fuck will fall in line with their ideology, incels largely don’t. Of course this raises the question as to whether or not sex havers are only pretending to agree with their women’s politics to get laid
     
     I think some of this is explained by the fact it takes some level of intellectual curiosity and/or contrarianism to arrive at an ideology that isn't libtardism. The more agreeable and conformist you are, the more likely you're a libtard, and the more likely you're a normie and can more easily get laid. There are exceptions of course, but in today's post-dating app world, average looking guys need to check every (social) box to even get a chance.
   • 🎄 Rick 🎄 (praxisofevil@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 03-Jun-2024 12:56:32 JST 🎄 Rick 🎄

     in reply to

     • synapsid

     @synapsid That's a good point. I was going to expound on it more but I didn't want to go off topic, it was mostly just an exploration of the psychology around sex not a rant about libtards.

   • Poast Oak (poastoak@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Jun-2024 04:37:56 JST Poast Oak

     in reply to
     @PraxisOfEvil >The reality is that if your only value to society is as a wet hole that’s incredibly sad and no way for a respectable woman to live
     
     I think about this exchange a lot
     Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks likes this.