Conversation

Notices

1. l (lebronjames75@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 08:48:05 JST l
   finally
   by gamers
   for gamers
   • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 08:48:01 JST Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:

     in reply to

     • Moon
     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)
     • p
     @Moon @p11 @lebronjames75 @why census data probably cannot get sexual orientations, that would be scary as fuck given current politics.
   • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced) (why@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 08:48:02 JST Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)

     in reply to

     • Moon
     • p
     @Moon @lebronjames75 @p11 yeah its all YOUR standards and not what THEIRS are to you. its a best case scenario where 100% of women would be interested in you. many men would argue the other way is the bottleneck but these sites paint a different picture
   • Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 08:48:02 JST Moon

     in reply to

     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)
     • p
     @why @lebronjames75 @p11 i could not tell if the stats excluded non-heterosexuals either
   • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced) (why@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 08:48:03 JST Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)

     in reply to

     • Moon
     • p
     @Moon @lebronjames75 @p11 married means currently married.
     the option is there for sluts who want to sleep with girls who have a husband
   • Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 08:48:03 JST Moon

     in reply to

     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)
     • p
     @why @lebronjames75 @p11 I just tested my actual preferences and not what I'd accept and it was below 10%, still not terrible odds by their reckoning but lets be serious the odds i'm going to find a non-overweight 26 year old to creampie is closer to 0%.
   • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced) (why@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 08:48:04 JST Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)

     in reply to

     • p
     @p11 @lebronjames75 you should check out https://realitycalc.com/
     >not married
     >not fat
     >able to reproduce
     the site doesnt let you do underage (you freak). i put upper limit at 29, you can reproduce in her 30s but probability of tism and other problems are gonna go way up
     24.74%. thats not terrible, but
     >exclude mothers?
     you have low standards, right? you should still be able to reproduce and give those kids some step-siblings.
     except
     >any income
     you sure? that's a lot of mouths to feed
     >any race
     i assume you have no problem with this too. no way to filter if theyre 1st generation or nationals. might need to teach juanita some ingles
     
     also no way to filter your first (and probably biggest) standard:
     >interested in me and what i do
     im not gonna judge but im gonna guess that requires at least a matching IQ for her to have genuine interest and speak at your level. you can do IQ calculations yourself, im afraid it might cut off a severe amount of available girls for the government to give you
     
     
     for any male interested person reading this there is also
     https://igotstandardsbro.com/
     n3n repeated this.
   • Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 08:48:04 JST Moon

     in reply to

     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)
     • p
     @why @p11 @lebronjames75 checking in, i'm assuming not married meant never married, I got 23%. If I unchecked "not married" it jumped to 57%.
   • p (p11@baraag.net)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 08:48:05 JST p

     in reply to

     @lebronjames75
     To some degree it wouldn't be bad to just get a decent girl and stay with her.
     I'm happy with any girlfriend who is interested in me and what I do, and who's not too fat and able to reproduce (especially not a man, who identifies as a woman, underage would be fine too, she will get older).

     I don't think, a government or algorithm would be good to find a suitable girlfriend. The most important factor is probably, that we live close to each other.

   • p (p11@baraag.net)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 08:49:03 JST p

     in reply to

     • Moon
     • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)

     @lanodan @Moon @lebronjames75 @why Nowadays many women identify as bi.
     Or they become lesbian after a bad experience with a guy until they meet the right guy.

     xianc78 likes this.
   • 寮 (ryo@social.076.moe)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 22:51:20 JST 寮

     in reply to

     • Moon
     My ideal woman:
     ・Drawing/fictional character (MUST!!).
     ・Small.
     ・Breast size flat (or less than A cup).
     
     Despite my very small list of preferences, 100% of all the countries in the world has 0 women like that.
     Moon likes this.
   • wildgoose :duckjam: (wildgoose@chudbuds.lol)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 22:54:53 JST wildgoose :duckjam:

     in reply to

     • 寮
     • Moon
     my only standard is "mom from Incredibles movie"
     Moon and mushroom_soup like this.
   • 寮 (ryo@social.076.moe)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Feb-2023 22:55:19 JST 寮

     in reply to

     • 寮
     OK, after watching this video, I have to add a new requirement to the list:
     ・Drawing must look good, which immediately disgards literally every single character in that video.
   • Johnny Peligro :nafo: (mischievoustomato@beefyboys.win)'s status on Thursday, 23-Feb-2023 10:46:34 JST Johnny Peligro :nafo:

     in reply to

     • Moon
     • pettanko
     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)
     • p
     • mental meltdown
     @netdoll @p11 @Moon @lebronjames75 @why @pettanko CSA
   • pettanko (pettanko@varishangout.net)'s status on Thursday, 23-Feb-2023 10:46:35 JST pettanko

     in reply to

     • Johnny Peligro :nafo:
     • Moon
     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)
     • p
     @MischievousTomato @p11 @Moon @lebronjames75 @why clearly what we need is an open-source tinder
   • mental meltdown (netdoll@ryona.agency)'s status on Thursday, 23-Feb-2023 10:46:35 JST mental meltdown

     in reply to

     • Johnny Peligro :nafo:
     • Moon
     • pettanko
     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)
     • p
     @pettanko @p11 @MischievousTomato @Moon @lebronjames75 @why What's the worst that could happen?
   • p (p11@baraag.net)'s status on Thursday, 23-Feb-2023 10:46:36 JST p

     in reply to

     • Moon
     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)

     @Moon @lebronjames75 @why I was already pretty close to dating a young, smart girl. At least we were meeting regularly. She was a good friend of my younger brother and lived in the same village.
     I guess the main reason why we stopped meeting was me not having WhatsApp, nor a device that could even run WhatsApp.

   • Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Thursday, 23-Feb-2023 10:46:36 JST Moon

     in reply to

     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)
     • p
     @p11 @lebronjames75 @why every time i have installed a proprietary messaging or social media app to try to get sex or companionship it backfired and i regretted installing that shit on my phone. Love is transient but adherence to the principles of software freedom is eternal.
   • Johnny Peligro :nafo: (mischievoustomato@beefyboys.win)'s status on Thursday, 23-Feb-2023 10:46:36 JST Johnny Peligro :nafo:

     in reply to

     • Moon
     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)
     • p
     @Moon @p11 @lebronjames75 @why i have also tried and failed and i use the open source alternatives but not because i like foss
   • mental meltdown (netdoll@ryona.agency)'s status on Thursday, 23-Feb-2023 10:47:20 JST mental meltdown

     in reply to

     • Johnny Peligro :nafo:
     • Moon
     • pettanko
     • Why (Bloomed & Unhanced)
     • p
     @MischievousTomato @p11 @Moon @lebronjames75 @why @pettanko I was thinking more atomwaffen type hijinks, you know it would happen here